Hybrid hard carbon framework derived from polystyrene bearing distinct molecular crosslinking for enhanced sodium storage

Yuqian Qiu,Guangshen Jiang,Yanxia Su,Xinren Zhang,Yuxuan Du,Xiaosa Xu,Qian Ye,Jinbo Zhang,Miaohan Ban,Fei Xu,Hongqiang Wang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/cey2.479
2024-02-22
Carbon Energy
Abstract:A versatile design of hybrid hard carbons with low defects/abundant closed pores and suitable interlayer spacing from polystyrene bearing distinct molecular bridges is proposed via in situ fusion/embedding strategy at low carbonization temperature. They showcase synergistic Na‐ions storage behavior with simultaneous high initial Coulombic efficiency, large capacity, and long‐term stability, which are well‐known paradoxes and have scarcely been achieved at low carbonization temperatures. Exploiting high‐performance yet low‐cost hard carbon anodes is crucial to advancing the state‐of‐the‐art sodium‐ion batteries. However, the achievement of superior initial Coulombic efficiency (ICE) and high Na‐storage capacity via low‐temperature carbonization remains challenging due to the presence of tremendous defects with few closed pores. Here, a facile hybrid carbon framework design is proposed from the polystyrene precursor bearing distinct molecular bridges at a low pyrolysis temperature of 800°C via in situ fusion and embedding strategy. This is realized by integrating triazine‐ and carbonyl‐crosslinked polystyrene nanospheres during carbonization. The triazine crosslinking allows in situ fusion of spheres into layered carbon with low defects and abundant closed pores, which serves as a matrix for embedding the well‐retained carbon spheres with nanopores/defects derived from carbonyl crosslinking. Therefore, the hybrid hard carbon with intimate interface showcases synergistic Na ions storage behavior, showing an ICE of 70.2%, a high capacity of 279.3 mAh g−1, and long‐term 500 cycles, superior to carbons from the respective precursor and other reported carbons fabricated under the low carbonization temperature. The present protocol opens new avenues toward low‐cost hard carbon anode materials for high‐performance sodium‐ion batteries.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?