Abstract:Receiving touch is of critical importance, as many studies have shown that touch promotes mental and physical well-being. We conducted a pre-registered (PROSPERO: CRD42022304281) systematic review and multilevel meta-analysis encompassing 137 studies in the meta-analysis and 75 additional studies in the systematic review ( n = 12,966 individuals, search via Google Scholar, PubMed and Web of Science until 1 October 2022) to identify critical factors moderating touch intervention efficacy. Included studies always featured a touch versus no touch control intervention with diverse health outcomes as dependent variables. Risk of bias was assessed via small study, randomization, sequencing, performance and attrition bias. Touch interventions were especially effective in regulating cortisol levels (Hedges' g = 0.78, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.24 to 1.31) and increasing weight (0.65, 95% CI 0.37 to 0.94) in newborns as well as in reducing pain (0.69, 95% CI 0.48 to 0.89), feelings of depression (0.59, 95% CI 0.40 to 0.78) and state (0.64, 95% CI 0.44 to 0.84) or trait anxiety (0.59, 95% CI 0.40 to 0.77) for adults. Comparing touch interventions involving objects or robots resulted in similar physical (0.56, 95% CI 0.24 to 0.88 versus 0.51, 95% CI 0.38 to 0.64) but lower mental health benefits (0.34, 95% CI 0.19 to 0.49 versus 0.58, 95% CI 0.43 to 0.73). Adult clinical cohorts profited more strongly in mental health domains compared with healthy individuals (0.63, 95% CI 0.46 to 0.80 versus 0.37, 95% CI 0.20 to 0.55). We found no difference in health benefits in adults when comparing touch applied by a familiar person or a health care professional (0.51, 95% CI 0.29 to 0.73 versus 0.50, 95% CI 0.38 to 0.61), but parental touch was more beneficial in newborns (0.69, 95% CI 0.50 to 0.88 versus 0.39, 95% CI 0.18 to 0.61). Small but significant small study bias and the impossibility to blind experimental conditions need to be considered. Leveraging factors that influence touch intervention efficacy will help maximize the benefits of future interventions and focus research in this field.

The Functions of Human Touch: An Integrative Review

Social touch and human development

Social touch experience in different contexts: A review

The C-Tactile System and the Neurobiological Mechanisms of “Affective” Tactile Perception: The History of Discoveries and the Current State of Research

Bridging skin, brain, and behavior to understand pleasurable social touch

A review of touch research in consumer psychology

Naturalistic stimuli in touch research

Progress on Flexible Tactile Sensors in Robotic Applications on Objects Properties Recognition, Manipulation and Human-Machine Interactions

Haptics in social interaction with agents and avatars in virtual reality: a systematic review

Touch in Human Social Robot Interaction: Systematic Literature Review with PRISMA Method

Social touch, CT touch and massage therapy: A narrative review

Touch medicine: bridging the gap between recent insights from touch research and clinical medicine and its special significance for the treatment of affective disorders

The Neurobiology Shaping Affective Touch: Expectation, Motivation, and Meaning in the Multisensory Context

How does it feel? Exploring touch on different levels of product experience

From hand to brain and back: Grip forces deliver insight into the functional plasticity of somatosensory processes

Deciphering Contact Interactions and Exploration Strategies Underlying Tactile Perception of Material Softness

Somatosensation in the Brain: A Theoretical Re-evaluation and a New Model

Affective Touch in the Context of Development, Oxytocin Signaling, and Autism

A Review of Surface Haptics:Enabling Tactile Effects on Touch Surfaces

Classification of Tactile Perception and Attention on Natural Textures from EEG Signals

A systematic review and multivariate meta-analysis of the physical and mental health benefits of touch interventions