Abstract:Among the organizational change literature,adaptation view and ecological view were two dominant perspectives.Adaptation view suggests that the purpose of organizational change is to adapt and achieve strategic fit with their environment.Yet researchers embracing ecological view have argued for an environmental selection process which determined the outcome of organization's behavior.This study recommends a brand new research paradigm,named the entrepreneurial view after a brief review of the two former perspectives.We developed a multi-level analytic framework to examine the effects of organization's proactive activities on its competitive advantage.It has long been noted that in a complex and intense competitive situation,the performance of an organization was dependent on its actions and rivals' reactions,so we were also concerned about how the organization's activities might affect the market process.The results indicated that proactive top managers of the firm would set expectations and search to identify the opportunities resulted from knowledge problem existing in the market.Those actions could establish a firm's competitive advantage to the extent that they exploit competitive ambiguity.Entrepreneurial alertness,professional knowledge,and creativity were three most important predictors of opportunity identification.Top managers adopted a bisociation process linking previously related or unrelated matrices of thought to seize the opportunities through entrepreneurial actions.Schumpeter and Kirzner had respectively defined entrepreneurial actions in two distinctive ways which we proposed as equilibrating and disequilibrating actions.Both actions were the consequence of bisociation process.Entrepreneurial actions carried out by the firm would eventually update the belief systems of all the market participants,yet leading to different market conditions according to the actions' appropriateness.It's in this way the firm had the capability to push the market process.Further in this study we used competitive dynamics theory to discuss how the firms evolved with their environment and to explore how two characteristics of the top management team might influence firm's competitive success.A series of interrelated and logically consistent propositions were presented to elaborate our analytic framework.Implications for the entrepreneurial view were discussed.

Developing organizational change capability: towards a dynamic, multi-faceted and multi-temporal model

Capabilities of Organizations in Change: A Dynamic Capability Framework

Organizational change capability: a systematic review and future research directions

An Experimental Study on Firm Organizational Change,HR Strategy and Change Coping Behaviour: an Organizational Learning Perspective

Organizational Change and Market Process:An Entrepreneurial Perspective

A Systemic Organizational Change Model in Occupational Health Management

Managerial Competency Modelling And The Development Of Organizational Psychology: A Chinese Approach

A theoretical framework of organizational change

Change competence: An integrative literature review

History and Organizational Change

Making change permanent A model for institutionalizing change interventions

Integrating the organizational change literature: a model for successful change

Gop Model Of Organizational Learning Underlying Enterprise Innovation Capability Reconfiguration Process

On Organizational Mechanism for Dynamic Capabilities Building: Case Study from Perspective of Knowledge Sharing and Collective Interpretation

The multiple faces of collective responses to organizational change: Taking stock and moving forward

Reframing organizational change from a processual perspective

Organizational Structures Changing With Capabilities Dynamization In Smes: A Case Study In Jgst

The Triangular Model for Dealing with Organizational Change

Innovation, Dynamic Capabilities, Leadership, and Action Plan

Social Construction of Organization. A New model in Organizational Development