Reliability and performance of the IRRAflow® system for intracranial lavage and evacuation of hematomas—A technical note

Mette Haldrup,Mojtaba Nazari,Chenghao Gu,Mads Rasmussen,Stig Dyrskog,Claus Ziegler Simonsen,Mads Grønhøj,Frantz Rom Poulsen,Naveed Ur Rehman,Anders Rosendal Korshoej
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0297131
IF: 3.7
2024-04-16
PLoS ONE
Abstract:Background Intraventricular hemorrhage (IVH) is a severe condition with poor outcomes and high mortality. IRRA flow ® (IRRAS AB) is a new technology introduced to accelerate IVH clearance by minimally invasive wash-out. The IRRA flow ® system performs active and controlled intracranial irrigation and aspiration with physiological saline, while simultaneously monitoring and maintaining a stable intracranial pressure (ICP). We addressed important aspects of the device implementation and intracranial lavage. Method To allow versatile investigation of multiple device parameters, we designed an ex vivo lab setup. We evaluated 1) compatibility between the IRRA flow ® catheter and the Silverline f10 bolt (Spiegelberg), 2) the physiological and hydrodynamic effects of varying the IRRA flow ® settings, 3) the accuracy of the IRRA flow ® injection volumes, and 4) the reliability of the internal ICP monitor of the IRRA flow ®. Results The IRRA flow ® catheter was not compatible with Silverline bolt fixation, which was associated with leakage and obstruction. Design space exploration of IRRA flow ® settings revealed that appropriate settings included irrigation rate 20 ml/h with a drainage bag height at 0 cm, irrigation rate 90 ml/h with a drainage bag height at 19 cm and irrigation rate 180 ml/h with a drainage bag height at 29 cm. We found the injection volume performed by the IRRA flow ® to be stable and reliable, while the internal ICP monitor was compromised in several ways. We observed a significant mean drift difference of 3.16 mmHg (variance 0.4, p = 0.05) over a 24-hour test period with a mean 24-hour drift of 3.66 mmHg (variance 0.28) in the pressures measured by the IRRA flow ® compared to 0.5 mmHg (variance 1.12) in the Raumedic measured pressures. Conclusion Bolting of the IRRA flow ® catheter using the Medtronic Silverline® bolt is not recommendable. Increased irrigation rates are recommendable followed by a decrease in drainage bag level. ICP measurement using the IRRA flow ® device was unreliable and should be accompanied by a control ICP monitor device in clinical settings.
multidisciplinary sciences
What problem does this paper attempt to address?