A Multicenter Assessment of Interreader Reliability of LI-RADS Version 2018 for MRI and CT
Cheng William Hong,Victoria Chernyak,Jin-Young Choi,Sonia Lee,Chetan Potu,Timoteo Delgado,Tanya Wolfson,Anthony Gamst,Jason Birnbaum,Rony Kampalath,Chandana Lall,Mishal Mendiratta-Lala,William Masch,Alexandra Roudenko,Andrea Siobhan Kierans,Giuseppe Brancatelli,An Tang,Milena Cerny,Alice Fung,Bobby Kalb,Katherine Blair,Natally Horvat,Shaun Best,Ryan Ash,Karthik Ganesan,Avinash Kambadakone,Jin Wang,Irene Cruite,Bijan Bijan,Mark Goodwin,Guilherme Moura Cunha,Dorathy Tamayo-Murillo,James T. Lee,Joseph W. Owen,Diego A. Aguirre,Matthew S. Davenport,Sara C. Lewis,Elizabeth M. Hecht,Mustafa R. Bashir,Michael L. Douek,Michael A. Ohliger,Eduardo A. Costa,Michael T. Corwin,John P. McGahan,Khaled M. Elsayes,Venkateswar R. Surabhi,Robert M. Marks,Christopher R. Kagay,Kathryn J. Fowler,Claude B. Sirlin
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.222855
IF: 19.7
2023-06-28
Radiology
Abstract:Background Various limitations have impacted research evaluating reader agreement for Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS). Purpose To assess reader agreement of LI-RADS in an international multicenter multireader setting using scrollable images. Materials and Methods This retrospective study used deidentified clinical multiphase CT and MRI and reports with at least one untreated observation from six institutions and three countries; only qualifying examinations were submitted....
radiology, nuclear medicine & medical imaging