Abstract:Whether green credit policy is conducive to improving the green innovation efficiency of heavy polluting industries is of great significance for China’s sustainable economic development and the construction of ecological civilization. This paper uses China’s Green Credit Guidelines to conduct a quasi-natural experiment based on relevant panel data of industries from 2007 to 2018. Specifically, it employs the Super-SBM model including non-expected output to measure the green innovation efficiency of 35 industries in China, and constructs the propensity score matching difference-in-difference model to explore how green credit policy impact on the green innovation efficiency of heavy polluting industries. The results show that the coefficient of difference-in-difference (DIDdocumentclass[12pt]{minimal}usepackage{amsmath}usepackage{wasysym}usepackage{amsfonts}usepackage{amssymb}usepackage{amsbsy}usepackage{mathrsfs}usepackage{upgreek}setlength{oddsidemargin}{-69pt}egin{document}$${DID}$$end{document}) was 0.262, which was significant at the 1% level; the coefficient of DID2012documentclass[12pt]{minimal}usepackage{amsmath}usepackage{wasysym}usepackage{amsfonts}usepackage{amssymb}usepackage{amsbsy}usepackage{mathrsfs}usepackage{upgreek}setlength{oddsidemargin}{-69pt}egin{document}$${{DID}}_{2012}$$end{document} was not significant; the coefficient of DID2013documentclass[12pt]{minimal}usepackage{amsmath}usepackage{wasysym}usepackage{amsfonts}usepackage{amssymb}usepackage{amsbsy}usepackage{mathrsfs}usepackage{upgreek}setlength{oddsidemargin}{-69pt}egin{document}$${{DID}}_{2013}$$end{document} was 0.490, which was significant at the 1% level; and the coefficient of DID2014documentclass[12pt]{minimal}usepackage{amsmath}usepackage{wasysym}usepackage{amsfonts}usepackage{amssymb}usepackage{amsbsy}usepackage{mathrsfs}usepackage{upgreek}setlength{oddsidemargin}{-69pt}egin{document}$${{DID}}_{2014}$$end{document} was 0.173, which was significant at the 1% level, indicating that green credit policy significantly contributes to the green innovation efficiency of heavy polluting industries, though with a lag effect. Further study finds that green credit policy pushes heavy polluting industries to improve green innovation efficiency by increasing financing cost and R&D investment; meanwhile, the heterogeneity test shows that the higher the state-owned share of the industry, the greater the positive effect of green credit policy on its green innovation efficiency. Finally, in order to accelerate the implementation of green credit policy and promote the green innovation efficiency of heavy polluting industries, banks can guide heavy polluting industrial enterprises through credit to carry out green technological transformation, heavy polluting industries should raise awareness of green innovation, and government should encourage heavy polluting industrial enterprises to carry out green innovation, and guide and supervise the state-owned enterprises in particular, so that they can improve cleanliness and achieve green economic development.

Output and welfare effect of green credit in China: Evidence from an estimated DSGE model

An evaluation of the impact of China’s green credit policy on different pathways using a CGE model

The effect of green credit policy on energy efficiency: Evidence from China

Can green credit policy improve environmental quality? Evidence from China

Green credit policy, credit allocation efficiency and upgrade of energy-intensive enterprises

Does green credit policy promote the green innovation efficiency of heavy polluting industries?-empirical evidence from China's industries

Does green credit policy promote the green innovation efficiency of heavy polluting industries?—empirical evidence from China’s industries

Green Credit, Financial Constraint, and Capital Investment: Evidence from China's Energy-intensive Enterprises

The impact of green credit on environmental quality: empirical evidence from China

Green Fiscal and Tax Policies in China: An Environmental Dynamic Stochastic General Equilibrium Approach

Transitioning to a green economy in China: The environmental and economic impacts of green credit

The impact of green credit on economic growth-The mediating effect of environment on labor supply

Towards a low-carbon economy: how does green credit affect carbon productivity?

Analysis of Green Credit and the Ecological Welfare Performance Based on Empirical Models and ARIMA(2,3,2): Taking China as an Example

Examining the economic and environmental effects of emissions policies in China: A Bayesian DSGE model

The economic and environmental effects of China’s environmental expenditure under financing constraints

The economic and environmental effects of China's environmental expenditure under financing constraints

An Examination of Green Credit Promoting Carbon Dioxide Emissions Reduction: A Provincial Panel Analysis of China

Can Green Credit Policy Promote Green Innovation Efficiency of Heavily Polluted Industries? Empirical Evidence from the China’s Industry

Effects of emission trading system on green total factor productivity in China: Empirical evidence from a quasi-natural experiment

The impact of green credit on energy efficiency from a green innovation perspective: Empirical evidence from China based on a spatial Durbin model