Abstract:This paper investigates the ontological characterization of Large Language Models (LLMs) like ChatGPT. Between inflationary and deflationary accounts, we pay special attention to their status as agents. This requires explaining in detail the architecture, processing, and training procedures that enable LLMs to display their capacities, and the extensions used to turn LLMs into agent-like systems. After a systematic analysis we conclude that a LLM fails to meet necessary and sufficient conditions for autonomous agency in the light of embodied theories of mind: the individuality condition (it is not the product of its own activity, it is not even directly affected by it), the normativity condition (it does not generate its own norms or goals), and, partially the interactional asymmetry condition (it is not the origin and sustained source of its interaction with the environment). If not agents, then ... what are LLMs? We argue that ChatGPT should be characterized as an interlocutor or linguistic automaton, a library-that-talks, devoid of (autonomous) agency, but capable to engage performatively on non-purposeful yet purpose-structured and purpose-bounded tasks. When interacting with humans, a "ghostly" component of the human-machine interaction makes it possible to enact genuine conversational experiences with LLMs. Despite their lack of sensorimotor and biological embodiment, LLMs textual embodiment (the training corpus) and resource-hungry computational embodiment, significantly transform existing forms of human agency. Beyond assisted and extended agency, the LLM-human coupling can produce midtended forms of agency, closer to the production of intentional agency than to the extended instrumentality of any previous technologies.

Embodied human language models vs. Large Language Models, or why Artificial Intelligence cannot explain the modal be able to

Large Models of What? Mistaking Engineering Achievements for Human Linguistic Agency

Large Language Models: The Need for Nuance in Current Debates and a Pragmatic Perspective on Understanding

The Limitations of Large Language Models for Understanding Human Language and Cognition

Large language models as linguistic simulators and cognitive models in human research

Large Language Models Demonstrate the Potential of Statistical Learning in Language

Large Language Models: A Historical and Sociocultural Perspective

On the Unexpected Abilities of Large Language Models

Large Language Models are as persuasive as humans, but how? About the cognitive effort and moral-emotional language of LLM arguments

Artificial Agency and Large Language Models

Animate, or Inanimate, That is the Question for Large Language Models

Toward Cultural Interpretability: A Linguistic Anthropological Framework for Describing and Evaluating Large Language Models (LLMs)

Symbols and grounding in large language models

Large language models and linguistic intentionality

Dissociating language and thought in large language models: a cognitive perspective

A Sentence is Worth a Thousand Pictures: Can Large Language Models Understand Hum4n L4ngu4ge and the W0rld behind W0rds?

Transforming Agency. On the mode of existence of Large Language Models

The Importance of Understanding Language in Large Language Models

Imitation and Large Language Models

Large Language Models as Instruments of Power: New Regimes of Autonomous Manipulation and Control

Humanlike Cognitive Patterns as Emergent Phenomena in Large Language Models