INTRODUCTION TO SPECIAL ISSUE ON FRONTIERS OF INNOVATION STUDIES AND ISSUES IN EMERGING ECONOMIES: A SCHUMPETERIAN PERSPECTIVE
Keun Lee,Xiaobo Wu,Chan‐Yuan Wong
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1142/s0217590822030023
2022-01-01
Abstract:The Singapore Economic ReviewVol. 67, No. 03, pp. 917-922 (2022) Free AccessINTRODUCTION TO SPECIAL ISSUE ON FRONTIERS OF INNOVATION STUDIES AND ISSUES IN EMERGING ECONOMIES: A SCHUMPETERIAN PERSPECTIVEKeun Lee, Xiaobo Wu, and Chan-Yuan WongKeun LeeDepartment of Economics, Seoul National University, Gwanak-ro 1, Seoul 08826, South Korea, Xiaobo WuSchool of Management, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang 310058, P. R. China, and Chan-Yuan WongInstitute of Technology Management, National Tsing Hua University, Hsinchu City 30013, Taiwan, R. O. Chinahttps://doi.org/10.1142/S0217590822030023Cited by:0 Next This article is part of the issue: Special Issue on Frontiers of Innovation Studies and Issues in Emerging Economies: A Schumpeterian PerspectiveGuest Editors: Keun Lee (Seoul National University), Xiaobo Wu (Zhejiang University) and Chan-Yuan Wong (National Tsing Hua University) AboutSectionsPDF/EPUB ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsRecommend to Librarian ShareShare onFacebookTwitterLinked InRedditEmail This Special Issue carries the articles centered around the designated theme of Frontiers of Innovation Studies and Issues in Emerging Economies: A Schumpeterian Perspective. The Call for Papers was distributed to the participants of the 2018 International Schumpeter Society, held in Seoul, South Korea and hosted by Prof. Keun Lee at the Seoul National University. Thus, many of the articles in this Issue are the revised and updated versions of the conference papers. These articles are joined by other papers that responded to the Call for Papers listed in the journal site, The Singapore Economic Review. Then, the three Guest Editors, Keun Lee, Xiaobo Wu and Chan-Yuan Wong, have worked together to process all the submitted papers and decided to accept these 10 papers.In Schumpeterian economics, a key theoretical framework is the National Innovation Systems (NIS). The effectiveness of each nation’s NIS will determine the innovative and economic performance of countries (Lundvall, 1992). The NIS view proposed that emerging technological paradigms may serve as a window of opportunity for a latecomer country to leapfrog into new technologies (Lee et al., 2020). The emergence of digital technology replacing analog technology in the 1990s served as a window for several Asian economies. Similarly, now the new wave of innovation called the Fourth Industrial Revolution (called 4IR) can possibly be a window for the next tier emerging economies. However, to realize these potentials, coordinated and strategic responses are needed from the public and private sectors, which are the focus of this Special Issue. The Special Issue is a collection of articles that deal with various issues broadly related to how innovations can be mobilized and leveraged to tackle economic problems in the emerging economies in Asia.In the original Call for Papers, the following are listed to help potential authors to consider their contributions:•Whether and how the 4IR can be a window of opportunity for new growth or a further source for reinforcing the existing difficulties in some of the emerging countries in Asia?•What are the possibilities and conditions for, and successful examples of, leapfrogging in emerging economies?•What are the “right” modes of engaging with global value chain (GVC) in terms of building effective national (or sectoral) innovation systems?•What would be the effective balance and interaction between indigenous aspect of innovation capabilities and openness to global sources of knowledge?•Should manufacturing continue to be the focus or should the potentials of service sectors be explored? If so, how?•What would be the effective and economic way of mixing business model innovations and technological innovations?•What would be the nature of organization and institutional changes required to strike a good match with new waves of innovation or 4IR?Although not all the articles are exact matches with the above theme, it seems now that this theme has affected directly and indirectly the writing and selection of papers gathered for this Special Issue. What follows provides a summary of the key contents of each paper collected in this Issue.The first and leading paper by Jun-ki Park et al. is about “The Determinants of Foreign Direct Investment in R&D: Different Inducement Effects of Private and Public R&D in Developed and Developing Host Countries”. This paper identifies the different determinants of the location of research and development (R&D) on foreign direct investment (FDI) in both the developed and developing countries. In the case of host developed countries, it finds that private R&D investment is positively associated with attracting R&D on FDI. In contrast, in the case of host developing countries, it finds that private R&D investment is not significantly associated with attracting R&D on FDI, but public R&D induces it. These findings imply that the objective of R&D on FDI in developed economies is to advance multinational corporations’ (MNCs) technology further by targeting the local technology market. In contrast, the R&D on FDI of MNCs in developing countries is attracted toward localities where the R&D infrastructure is better developed due to public R&D investment. MNCs in developing countries do not direct considerable attention to the R&D activities of the local private sector because their goal is to modify their own technology or products for the local product or export markets in the host countries. Therefore, although one obvious policy implication is the importance of conducting local R&D to attract foreign R&D, the more important factors are to stimulate private R&D further in the case of developed countries and to initiate public R&D first in the case of developing countries.The second paper is by Lan Khanh Chu and Hoang Phuong Dung on the “Determinants of Firm-Level Innovation Performance: New Evidences from ASEAN Manufacturing Firms”. Based on the stakeholder theory, the paper posits that firms’ innovation, as a strategic choice, is determined by not only their resources but also their pressures from different stakeholders and relationship with the government. Using a dataset of 3444 firms in seven ASEAN countries, it finds that firms’ innovative outputs are positively influenced by export orientation and fierce competition but restrained by the presence of foreign investment. In addition, while strengthening the relationship with government facilitates the chance to create some types of innovation, it could magnify or dampen the effect of those pressures on firms’ innovation. These findings have useful implications for the firms’ managers to accumulate and spend resources to build up a strong capacity for innovation. For the governments in the ASEAN region, they should focus on improving institutional quality and providing incentives for foreign investments that only bring advanced technologies and spillover effects.The third paper is a contribution by Zhuqing Mao, and her paper examines the relationship between participation in GVCs and economic growth. It demonstrates that a U-shaped, nonlinear pattern of GVCs could be more effective than the simple linear pattern of GVCs in terms of economic growth in the high- and middle-income economies. The U-shaped nonlinear pattern expresses that the foreign-dominated GVCs are decreased (increased high value-added domestic value chains) for building the local value chain and then the GVCs’ participation is increased to benefit at a better position in them. This paper investigated a panel of 63 advanced and emerging economies and obtained significant evidence by using systemic quantitative analysis. This research suggests that emerging markets should decrease the foreign-dominated GVCs (increase high value-added domestic value chains) and then increase the participation of the GVC for economic growth at later stages. This finding is consistent with the so-called In–Out–In again pattern of GVC participation confirmed in Lee et al. (2018).The paper by Mei Hsiu-Ching Ho is entitled “Evolutionary Network of Business Models Studies and Applications in Emerging Economies”. Business models are crucial for explaining the firm performance. In practice, managers apply business models to increase firm’s advantage. Particularly, innovative business models solve many economic and social problems in emerging economies. To show the knowledge development in the field, this paper explores the knowledge network and identifies the role of business models in emerging economies. To examine the primary topics in business model studies, it reviews the academic literature and applies Main Path Analysis (MPA) to explain the development in this field since 2000. The valid sample of this study was comprised of 665 papers, and citation information was used in the MPA. It further investigates the role of business models in emerging economies through keyword analysis and case analysis. The results for the main path indicate that the development of business model studies proceeded in three stages. In general, the literature in business model studies has transitioned from discussing the internal and external values to framing business model structures. Specifically, in the latest stage, sustainability in a business model was conceptualized, and studies focused on how a business model can function as a structured model for explaining how various businesses operate. Moreover, studies on emerging economies have noted the importance of sustainable business models and model adaptations for firms in developing countries.Next, the paper by Yuwen Liu and Chin-Chia Liang is about “Exploring Innovation Factors Affecting Economic Performance in Emerging Asian Countries: A Machine Learning Approach”. This study aims to identify the main innovation factors that affect the economic performance of emerging countries. It analyzes data on 21 innovation-related variables in six emerging Asian countries (China, Indonesia, Malaysia, the Philippines, Thailand and Vietnam) from 1990 to 2008. Using Principal Component Analysis (PCA), it identifies six factors that explained up to 90.6% of variations of all of the variables. Taking the least absolute shrinkage and selecting the operator clustering approach to variable selection, along with other classification and estimation methods, it explores the effects of the six identified factors on economic growth. Research and development expenditure and contract enforcement (cost) had negative effects on economic growth, whereas the gross enrolment ratio (tertiary), primary-school pupil–teacher ratio (inverse), paved roads and number of registered carrier departures worldwide had positive effects on economic growth.Professor Dong Wu et al. have contributed the sixth paper in this Special Issue, entitled “An Integrated Model of Knowledge Transfer from Global Flagships to Local Firms in Global Production Networks”. It is known that global flagships’ capacity and willingness to transfer knowledge in global production networks will affect the knowledge acquisition of local firms. However, the mechanism is not clear enough, or rather scattered, and thus lacks an integrated model for comprehensive conceptualization. Adopting a sample of 105 Chinese firms, this paper constructs an integrated two-stage model to interpret the mechanism of knowledge transfer from global flagships to local firms and finds that global flagships’ capacity and willingness to transfer positively impact the knowledge acquired by local firms through the mediation of the knowledge contributed by the global flagships. Organizational distance and local firms’ absorptive capacity affect the knowledge acquired by local firms as well. The influence of the above two factors also depends on the different types of ties between global flagships and local firms.The seventh paper is by Dr. Raeyoon Kang et al., entitled “Not Patents but Trademarks-Based Path of Technological Development of Latecomers: Evidence from the Korean Data”. In contrast to the vast literature on verifying the importance of formal R&D activities measured as patent registrations, this paper explores the possibility of not patent but trademark-driven path of latecomer firms’ technological development. The study is motivated by the evidence from the Korean data showing the existence of two groups of sectors where firms in one group tended to file more trademarks than patents. It finds that in the first group of sectors, like food, apparel and pharmaceuticals, trademarks have been the dominant form of the IPRs with a much large number of their registrations than patents from the initial stage of development until recently, whereas in the second groups of sectors, like electronics and automobiles, the main IPR form has been patents. Regressions on the determinants about this bifurcation find that the trademark groups are those sectors involving more tacit knowledge and/or domestic market orientation associated with slow progress in technological capabilities. The results are important because they imply the existence of alternative path of economic development by the latecomer firms in different sectors, besides the patent-driven path which is already verified in Kim et al. (2012).The eighth paper is entitled “Does Students Mobility Affect Trade Flow? New Evidence from Chinese Provinces”, authored by Yasir Khan and Qiu Bin. This paper investigates the impact and relationship of international students’ inflow with export and import trade based on the panel data of 28 provinces in China from 2000 to 2016. Due to the remarkable differences in economic and social developments across various regions, the characteristics and pattern of international students’ inflow in different Chinese provinces are significantly large. This study finds that international students’ inflow promotes the development of the host country’s export and import trade. The results show that international students’ inflow is positive and statistically significant in the Fixed Effect (FE) and the Generalized Method of Moments (GMM) estimations. It implies that the Chinese government should attach great importance to the role of international students’ inflow to promote import and export trade. Attracting international students needs effective strategies and policies to promote the flow of international trade, and improve the stability of the sustained growth of export and import trade.The ninth paper is entitled “Does Imported Producer Service Affect Manufacturing Export? Evidence from China”, authored by Yao Xiao et al. Based on a panel data of 44 countries and 18 industries spanning 14 years, this paper provides a novel insight into the driving force behind the expanding volume of China’s export. It matches the global input–output database with micro-level data from the Chinese manufacturing firms and finds a positive effect of imported producer service inputs on the domestic manufacturing exports. Foreign producer service inputs assist the domestic firms in entering foreign markets and maintaining foreign relations, thus contributing to their exporting performance. The results confirm the specialization effect and information cost reduction effect led by imported service inputs.The last paper is entitled “Innovation and Corruption: Dissecting Causal Linkage Using Patent Application Information from India”, contributed by Prashant Poddar and Sanjay Kumar Singh. Using the World Bank Enterprise Survey data on bribery and patent applications in India, the paper tries to study the causal linkage between firm-level innovation and corruption in India. Specifically, it tries to understand if corruption impacts innovation at the firm level. Since it finds that innovation and corruption are jointly determined, it proposes the instrumental variables regression approach to identify this causal effect. It instruments bribery by an exogenously determined external audit parameter and then uses a recursive bivariate probit model combined with industry-fixed effects to reach the results. The findings suggest that bribery has an adverse impact on innovation. The results of this study are much in contrast to the existing literature, which largely supports a positive relationship between innovation and corruption. References Kim, YK, K Lee, WG Park and K Choo [2012] Appropriate intellectual property protection and economic growth in countries at different levels of development. Research Policy, 41(2), 358–375. Crossref, ISI, Google Scholar Lee, K, M Szapiro and Z Mao [2018] From global value chains (GVC) to innovation systems for local value chains and knowledge creation. The European Journal of Development Research, 30(3), 424–441. Crossref, ISI, Google Scholar Lee, K, F Malerba and A Primi [2020] The fourth industrial revolution, changing global value chains and industrial upgrading in emerging economies. Journal of Economic Policy Reform, 23, 359–370. https://doi.org/10.1080/17487870.2020.1735386. Crossref, ISI, Google Scholar Lundvall, B-Å [1992] National Systems of Innovation: Toward a Theory of Innovation and Interactive Learning. London: Frances Pinter. Google Scholar FiguresReferencesRelatedDetails Recommended Vol. 67, No. 03 Metrics History Published: 11 February 2022 PDF download