Mathematical pressure volume models of the cerebrospinal fluid

James M. Drake,Sivabal Sivaloganathan,Guiseppe Tenti

DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.math/9604245

1996-04-01

Abstract:Numerous mathematical models have emerged in the medical literature over the past two decades attempting to characterize the pressure and volume dynamics the central nervous system compartment. These models have been used to study he behavior of this compartment under such pathological clinical conditions s hydrocephalus, head injury and brain edema. The number of different pproaches has led to considerable confusion regarding the validity, accuracy or appropriateness of the various models. In this paper we review the mathematical basis for these models in a mplified fashion, leaving the mathematical details to appendices. We show at most previous models are in fact particular cases of a single basic differential equation describing the evolution in time of the cerebrospinal fluid pressure (CFS). Central to this approach is the hypothsis that the rate change of CSF volume with respect to pressure is a measure of the compliance of the brain tissue which as a consequence leads to particular models epending on the form of the compliance funtion. All such models in fact give essentially no information on the behavior of the brain itself. More recent models (solved numerically using the Finite Element Method) have begun to address this issue but have difficulties due to the lack of information about the mechanical properties of the brain. Suggestions are made on how development of models which account for these chanical properties might be developed.

Numerical Analysis

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

The problem that this paper attempts to solve is related to the unity and accuracy of the pressure and volume dynamic modeling of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF). Specifically, the authors reviewed and analyzed a variety of mathematical models proposed in the past two decades. These models aim to describe the pressure and volume change dynamics of the central nervous system compartments (especially cerebrospinal fluid) under different pathological conditions, such as hydrocephalus, head injury, and cerebral edema.

### Main problems

1. **Confusion Caused by Model Diversity**:
- Since different research teams have proposed multiple models, there has been confusion regarding the effectiveness, accuracy, and applicability of these models. Therefore, the authors hope to help clarify the chaos in this field by simplifying and uniformly reviewing the mathematical foundations of these models.

2. **Limitations of Existing Models**:
- Most existing models focus on describing the pressure - volume relationship of cerebrospinal fluid and fail to provide sufficient information about the brain's own behavior. For example, most models assume that the rate of change of cerebrospinal fluid volume with respect to pressure is an indicator of brain tissue compliance, but this assumption may no longer hold for large - range pressure changes.
- Newer models attempt to solve this problem through the finite element method (FEM), but due to the lack of detailed information about the mechanical properties of brain tissue, these models still face difficulties.

3. **Establishing More Accurate Models**:
- The authors suggest developing new models that can take into account the mechanical properties of brain tissue. This requires more experimental data to support and needs to combine the classical concepts of physics to explain intracranial physiopathological phenomena.

### Core Equations of Mathematical Models

The authors point out that almost all existing models can be regarded as special cases of a basic differential equation, which describes the evolution of cerebrospinal fluid pressure over time:

\[ C(P)\frac{dP}{dt}+\frac{P(t)}{R_a}=I_f(t)+\frac{P_d}{R_a} \]

where:
- \( C(P) \) is the compliance function of brain tissue;
- \( P(t) \) is the cerebrospinal fluid pressure;
- \( R_a \) is the fluid resistance;
- \( I_f(t) \) is the cerebrospinal fluid production rate;
- \( P_d \) is the threshold pressure.

### Different Types of Models

1. **Linear Models**:
- Assume that the compliance \( C(P) \) is a constant, which is suitable for pressure changes within a small range.
- The equation form is: \[ C_0\frac{dP}{dt}+\frac{P(t)}{R_a}=I_f^{(e)}+\frac{P_d}{R_a}+S(t) \]

2. **Non - linear Models**:
- Considering large - range pressure changes, the compliance \( C(P) \) is a function of pressure, such as in exponential or hyperbolic forms.
- The model proposed by Marmarou et al. assumes \( C(P)=\frac{1}{kP} \), thus deriving an exponential form of the pressure - volume relationship.

### Summary

The main objective of this paper is to propose a unified method to understand and improve the mathematical modeling of cerebrospinal fluid dynamics by reviewing and analyzing existing models, in order to better explain intracranial pressure changes under pathological conditions and provide guidance for future research.