Abstract:Multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA) is a generic term for approaches supporting the systematic evaluation of alternatives in problems involving multiple criteria and stakeholders. One of the most challenging tasks is to gather preference information from stakeholders in a way that both reflects their true opinions and meets the theoretical requirements of the applied MCDA approach. Various techniques have been used in practice, including interviews and decision conferences. In this paper, we present a new cost-efficient approach in which an analyst generates weight profiles for various stakeholder groups. That is, instead of personally asking specific trade-off questions from the stakeholders, weight profiles are developed on the basis of more general preference information collected from the stakeholders. The potential advantages of this approach are: (i) the collection of the preferences using surveys is less laborious than personal interviews or decision conferences and (ii) the risk of cognitive biases in the weight elicitation can be reduced, because the most challenging task of MCDA — assigning weights to the criteria — is left to the analyst, who should be aware of typical biases and how to avoid them. We developed and tested the approach in a contested public decision-making situation related to the development of a new residential area. We utilised the data gathered from the participants of the workshops (21) as well as the data from a web survey including 177 responds via a randomly sampled closed survey, in addition to 484 responds via an open survey. Four preference profiles each having specific weight distributions to criteria were developed, using a multi-stage procedure. Four development alternatives were compared as based on the developed preference profiles. We were able to realise the MCDA process within a very tight time schedule, create plausible preference profiles and summarise each alternative’s pros and cons from different perspectives. However, we also identified several issues which have to be paid more attention in future cases or require further research.

Preference learning and multiple criteria decision aiding: differences, commonalities, and synergies–part I

Preference learning and multiple criteria decision aiding: differences, commonalities, and synergies—part II

Deep preference learning for multiple criteria decision analysis

Robust ordinal regression in preference learning and ranking

Decision-aid and decision-making

Making Good Decisions in Healthcare with Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis: The Use, Current Research and Future Development of MCDA

The use of multi-criteria decision-making methods in project portfolio selection: a literature review and future research directions

Consumer Preference Analysis: A Data-Driven Multiple Criteria Approach Integrating Online Information

Data-driven preference learning methods for value-driven multiple criteria sorting with interacting criteria

Application of multiple criteria decision aiding in environmental policy-making processes

Improving preference disaggregation in multicriteria decision making: incorporating time series analysis and a multi-objective approach

A hybrid machine learning framework for analyzing human decision making through learning preferences

A Preference Learning Framework for Multiple Criteria Sorting with Diverse Additive Value Models and Valued Assignment Examples

Representation of preferences for multiple criteria decision aiding in a new seven-valued logic

Use of Analyst-Generated Stakeholder Preference Profiles in Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis — Experiences from an Urban Planning Case

Data-driven preference learning in multiple criteria decision making in the evidential reasoning context

A Progressive Sorting Approach for Multiple Criteria Decision Aiding in the Presence of Non-Monotonic Preferences

Are MCDA Methods Benchmarkable? A Comparative Study of TOPSIS, VIKOR, COPRAS, and PROMETHEE II Methods

Adaptive multi-criteria decision making for electric vehicles: a hybrid approach based on RANCOM and ESP-SPOTIS

Eliciting User Preferences for Personalized Multi-Objective Decision Making through Comparative Feedback

Pairwise Comparison Matrix in Multiple Criteria Decision Making