Abstract:Studies on farmer-herder conflicts in Africa have concentrated on how scarcity of resources, marginalization, ethno-religious and political factors and institutional and governance failures have engendered the conflicts. Little attention is paid to how perceptions of injustices contribute to the escalation of the conflicts and violence. Thus, this paper examines the escalation of farmer-herder conflict and violence in the Benue-Nasarawa borderland in Nigeria from the perspective of natural resource scarcity and perceptions of injustices. The study uses interviews and field observations for data collection. It uses a political ecology approach to clarify the material interests underlying the conflict stemming from grievances regarding crop damage and cattle killings. The political ecology approach helps to analyze how the acquisition and privatization of wetlands by agro-industrial projects increased the resource competition between pastoralists and farmers, resulting in more crop damage by herders' cattle and cattle theft/killings by farmers. Then, it uses relative deprivation theory and social injustice perspectives to explore how the perceptions of injustices about managing the disagreement concerning crop damage by herders' cattle and cattle theft/killings by farmers following increased resource competition escalate the conflict. It argues that state intervention, notably the anti-open grazing law, amplifies the perceptions of procedural and restorative injustices, prompting violent responses from pastoralists and counter-attacks from farmers. Contrary to the political ecology perspective that often attributes the conflict to state policies marginalizing pastoralists, I argue that material interests are at the heart of the conflict, with perceptions of injustices escalating it into violence. The paper suggests that the analysis of the conflicts can be improved by incorporating political ecology, social justice and relative deprivation perspectives, which arguably improves the understanding of how resource scarcity leads to conflict intensification and escalation of violence.

The Agrarian Conflicts and Food Crises Nexus in Contemporary Latin America

South African Riots: Repercussion of the Global Food Crisis and US Drought

Converging Social Justice Issues and Movements: Implications for Political Actions and Research

Critical Latin American agroecology as a regionalism from below

The Food Crises and Political Instability in North Africa and the Middle East

Conflict in Africa during COVID-19: social distancing, food vulnerability and welfare response

Feminism, Food Sovereignty and Cross-Movement Mobilisation Against Neoliberal Globalisation in Latin America: :

Decreasing consumer animosity: The relationship between fast food businesses and social conflicts in Latin America and the Caribbean

Conflict's impacts on food systems: Mapping available evidence of interactions

Emerging responses to the COVID-19 crisis from family farming and the agroecology movement in Latin America - A rediscovery of food, farmers and collective action

Agroecologically efficient agricultural systems for smallholder farmers: contributions to food sovereignty

Food, Justice, and Land

Economic Globalization and Social Movements in Latin America

Why agronomy in the developing world has become contentious

Conflict in Yemen: From Ethnic Fighting to Food Riots

The Social Contradictions of Regional Development in the ALBA-TCP: The Case of Food Production

Agronomic or contentious land change? A longitudinal analysis from the Eastern Brazilian Amazon

Analysis of Food Security of Older Rural Indigenous People in Latin America and the Caribbean

Exploring agroforestry and food security in Latin America: a systematic review

Perceptions of injustices in the struggle for scarce critical lands: Farmer-herder conflict and violence escalation in the Benue-Nasarawa borderland

Climate variability, crop and conflict: Exploring the impacts of spatial concentration in agricultural production