Pathogenic Germline Variants in Uveal Melanoma Driver and BAP1‐Associated Genes in Finnish Patients with Uveal Melanoma

Pauliina E. Repo,Eveliina Jakkula,Juho Hiltunen,Heidi Putkuri,Aleksandra Staskiewicz‐Tuikkanen,Reetta‐Stiina Järvinen,Martin Täll,Virpi Raivio,Rana'a T. Al‐Jamal,Tero T. Kivelä,Joni A. Turunen
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/pcmr.13198
2024-10-01
Pigment Cell & Melanoma Research
Abstract:We enrolled a consecutive cohort of 270 Finnish patients with uveal melanoma (UM) and analyzed them for pathogenic germline variants in 19 genes associated with UM, BAP1, or renal cell carcinoma (RCC). One patient carried the pathogenic BRCA1 variant c.3626del; p.(Leu1209*), while another had a likely pathogenic MET variant c.252C>G; p.(Tyr84*). Additionally, two patients were identified as heterozygous for the recessive pathogenic BLM variant c.2824‐2A>T. Uveal melanoma (UM) is a rare yet aggressive eye cancer causing over 50% mortality from metastasis. Familial UM, amounting to 1%–6% of patients in Finland and the United States, mostly lack identified genetic cause, while 8% show associations with other cancer syndromes. We searched novel genetic associations for predisposition to UM, additional to already studied BAP1 and MBD4, by using targeted amplicon sequencing of 19 genes associated with UM, BAP1, or renal cell carcinoma in 270 consecutively enrolled Finnish patients with UM. Key UM drivers GNAQ, GNA11, CYSLTR2, PLCB4, EIF1AX, and SF3B1 lacked pathogenic germline variants. One patient carried the pathogenic BRCA1 variant c.3626del p.(Leu1209*), and one harbored a novel truncating MET variant c.252C > G p.(Tyr84*), classified as likely pathogenic. FLCN and BRCA2, previously identified with pathogenic variants in patients with UM, did not have such variants in our cohort. Two patients were heterozygous for a pathogenic recessive BLM variant c.2824‐2A > T. None of the carriers of identified variants had familial UM. We identified BRCA1 and MET as genes with pathogenic germline variants in Finnish UM patients, each with a frequency of 0.4% (95% confidence interval, 0–2).
dermatology,oncology,cell biology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?