Exploring external validity of chemotherapy for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma in real life

Michele Reni,Guido Giordano,Marco Audisio,Giulia Orsi,Marina Macchini,Stefania Maria Gobba,Ilario Rapposelli,Antonio Lucenti,Giovanna Luchena,Luca Faloppi,Fable Zustovich,Vincenzo Ricci,Massimiliano Cergnul,Vincenzo Formica,Letizia Procaccio,Valeria Baccolini,Assunta Briccolani,Stefano Cascinu,Umberto Peretti
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dld.2024.06.025
IF: 5.165
2024-07-15
Digestive and Liver Disease
Abstract:Introduction Cisplatin, nab-paclitaxel, capecitabine, and gemcitabine (PAXG) regimen activity was assessed in a single institution phase II trial (PACT-19) on pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). The PACT-31 study explored the external validity of PACT-19 results. Materials and Methods Patients aged ≥18 and ≤75 years with KPS ≥70, and PDAC diagnosis receiving PAXG in the participating institutions were eligible and categorized as follows: A) PACT-19; B) PACT-31-HSR; C) PACT-31-non-HSR. With a sample of 175 patients, assuming a target 1-year overall survival of 60 % for metastatic and of 80 % for non-metastatic patients, the trial will be considered successful with the 1-year OS falling into the 95 % CI. Results Data from 68 PACT-19 and 168 PACT-31 patients were retrieved. After 124 events, 1yOS was 52.5 % (95 %CI: 44.6–60.4 %) for metastatic and 80.5 % (95 %CI: 71.9–89.1 %) for non-metastatic patients. Survival overlapped between PACT-19 and PACT-31-HSR (median 17.6 and 17.4 months, p = 0.21) and was significantly shorter in PACT-31-non-HSR (median 11.3 months; p = 0.03). Differences of dose-intensity, use of maintenance therapy, and treatment after progression between PACT-31-HSR and non-HSR were evidenced. Discussion PACT-19 results have external validity. The outcome difference between HSR and non-HSR centers endorses the need of creating a hub-and-spoke network aimed at sharing the expertise on rare-diseases.
gastroenterology & hepatology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?