Tweets vs. Mendeley readers: How do these two social media metrics differ?

Stefanie Haustein,Vincent Larivière,Mike Thelwall,Didier Amyot,Isabella Peters
DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1410.0569
2014-10-02
Digital Libraries
Abstract:A set of 1.4 million biomedical papers was analyzed with regards to how often articles are mentioned on Twitter or saved by users on Mendeley. While Twitter is a microblogging platform used by a general audience to distribute information, Mendeley is a reference manager targeted at an academic user group to organize scholarly literature. Both platforms are used as sources for so-called altmetrics to measure a new kind of research impact. This analysis shows in how far they differ and compare to traditional citation impact metrics based on a large set of PubMed papers.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?