Abstract:It has been said that 'God invented plasticity, but the Devil invented fracture!' Both mechanisms represent the two prime modes of structural failure, respectively, plastic collapse and the rupture/breaking of a component, but the concept of developing materials with enhanced resistance to fracture can be difficult. This is because fracture resistance invariably involves a compromise-between strength and ductility, between strength and toughness-fundamentally leading to a 'conflict' between nano-/micro-structural damage and the mechanisms of toughening. Here, we examine the two major classes of such toughening: (i) intrinsic toughening, which occurs ahead of a crack tip and is motivated by plasticity-this is the principal mode of fracture resistance in ductile materials, and (ii) extrinsic toughening, which occurs at, or in the wake of, a crack tip and is associated with crack-tip shielding-this is generally the sole mode of fracture resistance in brittle materials. We briefly examine how these distinct mechanistic processes have been used to toughen synthetic materials-intrinsically in gradient materials and in multiple principal-element metallic alloys with the example of metallic glasses and high-entropy alloys, and extrinsically in ceramics with the example of ceramic-matrix composites-in comparison to Nature which has been especially adept in creating biological/natural materials which are toughened by one or both mechanistic classes, despite often consisting of constituents with meagre mechanical properties. The success of Nature has been driven by its ability to cultivate the development of materials with multiple length-scale hierarchical structures that display ingenious gradients and structural adaptability, a philosophy which we need to emulate and more importantly learn to synthesize to make structural materials of the future with unprecedented combinations of mechanical properties. This article is part of a discussion meeting issue 'A cracking approach to inventing new tough materials: fracture stranger than friction'.

Mechanical metamaterials: does toughness characterize fracture?

The toughness of mechanical metamaterials

Disorder Enhances the Fracture Toughness of Mechanical Metamaterials

Fracture metamaterials with on-demand crack paths enabled by bending

Fracture Mechanics of Bi-material Lattice Metamaterials

Metamaterials with engineered failure load and stiffness

Superior fracture resistance and topology-induced intrinsic toughening mechanism in 3D shell-based lattice metamaterials

Data-driven and Topological Design of Structural Metamaterials for Fracture Resistance

Discrete‐Continuum Duality of Architected Materials: Failure, Flaws, and Fracture

Damage-programmable design of metamaterials achieving crack-resisting mechanisms seen in nature

On the Fracture Toughness of Advanced Materials

Fracture and size effect in mechanical metamaterials

Design and Deformation Behavior of Multi-phase Mechanical Metamaterials

Toughening materials: enhancing resistance to fracture

Toughness and damage tolerance of fractal hierarchical metamaterials

Data-driven discovery of quasi-disordered mechanical metamaterials failed progressively

Design criteria for tough metamaterials

Strong and Tough Bioinspired Additive-Manufactured Dual-Phase Mechanical Metamaterial Composites

Toughening Amplification of Microcracks in Staggered Composites