Abstract:Over the past three decades, measurement of response validity in clinical neuropsychology has become a topic of keen importance. Prior to the 1990s, few neuropsychologists regularly assessed performance validity (cf., Lezak, Citation 1976 ), and embellished or malingered cognitive deficits were thought unlikely (cf. Bigler, Citation 1986 ). Once deemed relevant only for forensic evaluations, there are ample indications that some individuals undergoing clinical evaluations obtain abnormal scores on performance validity tests (cf. Martin & Schroeder, Citation 2020 ). Practice guidelines have emerged, and measurement of performance validity is now a norm rather than exception (Bush et al., Citation 2005 ; Chafetz et al., Citation 2015 , Heilbronner et al., Citation 2009 ; Sweet et al., Citation 2021 ).

Introduction to the special issue on performance validity: what are we doing? What should we do?