Developmental Timing of Adversity and Mental Health Across the Lifespan
Ran Barzilay
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.29376
2024-09-02
JAMA Network Open
Abstract:Associations of adversity in the form of traumatic experiences and stressful events with health outcomes are well appreciated, particularly when adversity is experienced early in the lifespan. 1 Copeland and colleagues 2 address an open question regarding the role of development in the association of adversity with mental health. Through integration of data from 3 studies spanning the age range from 2 to 30 years and via combination of cross-sectional and longitudinal analyses, this study 2 found that the magnitude of the association of adversity with depressive and anxiety symptoms was consistent across developmental stages. The authors 2 additionally found that, overall, compared with past exposure to trauma, recent stressful events that are not considered traumatic had similar or even greater associations with mental health symptoms. Last, they report that the combination of recent stressful events and past trauma resulted in additive, but not interactive, effects on mental health symptoms. 2 These findings challenge some theoretical models of developmental science. Based on the sensitive periods framework, the brain is differentially susceptible to adversity throughout development given differences in neuroplasticity across developmental stages, 3 such that adversity experienced in a certain developmental stage should have different associations with mental health than if experienced in other stages. Furthermore, the findings do not align with developmental theories of differential susceptibilities to adversity based on past exposures, such as stress sensitization, 4 whereby prior exposure to trauma sensitizes the individual to later stress exposures, or stress inoculation, 5 where past adversity makes the individual less vulnerable to future stress exposure. The current study 2 advances the field of developmental science in 2 ways that allow empirical testing of theoretical frameworks. First, by leveraging 3 cohort studies that used harmonized measures from infancy to adulthood and collected data on exposures prospectively, the authors 2 were able to test the association of development with vulnerability to adversity exposure over a long period of time while mitigating risk of recall bias. Second, by teasing apart adversity to components of trauma (exposures that would meet Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders [Fourth Edition] criterion A for a posttraumatic stress disorder diagnosis) and recent stressful events (ie, negative life events that would not be considered traumatic and that occurred in the past 3 months), the authors 2 were able to compare contributions of different magnitudes of adversity and to appreciate their combined contribution to mental health. The consistency of the association of adversity with emotional symptoms across developmental stages can be explained by different mechanisms. First, it is possible that the vulnerability to adversity is stable, perhaps through evolutionary forces that conserve distress in response to adversity because it may promote survival throughout the lifespan. Second, stress vulnerability may well be a dynamic process that changes throughout development, but there may also be opposing dynamic factors that buffer stress exposures in the form of resilience mechanisms, which counter the deleterious effects of adversity and result in a zero-sum effect, where the observed associations of adversity with mental health remain stable. This explanation can align with theoretical models that conceptualize resilience as a dynamic construct that keeps adapting to meet developmental requirements. 6 Third, it may be the case that as individuals age, they experience health impacts of adversity in areas beyond mental health, which were not measured in the current study. 2 One conceptual model that may support this explanation is that of allostatic load, the wear and tear of physiological systems in response to chronic stress, which affects both mental and physical health. 7 Accordingly, it is possible that over the lifespan, the toll of adversity takes the form of increased allostatic load that may lead to more physical health symptoms than mental health symptoms, which remain stable in their association with adversity. Last, it could be that some inherent challenges in this study design (eg, harmonizing measures across ages) or measurement (eg, relying on parent report in early age and transitioning to self-report in older age) may have hampered the researchers' ability to detect differential associations of adversity with mental health across developmental stages. To conclude, Copeland et al 2 leveraged 3 studies spanning infancy to young adulthood to demonstrate that associations of adversity with mental health do not depend on the developmental st -Abstract Truncated-
medicine, general & internal