Abstract:Purpose Social media platforms are a pervasive technology that continues to define the modern world. While social media has brought many benefits to society in terms of connection and content sharing, numerous concerns remain for the governance of social media platforms going forward, including (but not limited to) the spread of misinformation, hate speech and online surveillance. However, the voice of citizens and other non-experts is often missing from such conversations in information systems literature, which has led to an alleged gap between research and the everyday life of citizens. Design/methodology/approach The authors address this gap by presenting findings from 16 h of online dialog with 25 citizens on social media platform governance. The online dialog was undertaken as part of a worldwide consultation project called "We, the internet", which sought to provide citizens with a voice on a range of topics such as "Digitalization and Me," "My Data, Your Data, Our Data" and "A Strong Digital Public Sphere." Five phases of thematic analysis were undertaken by the authors to code the corpus of qualitative data. Findings Drawing on the Theory of Communicative Action, the authors discuss three dialogical processes critical to citizen discourse: lifeworld reasoning, rationalization and moral action. The findings point toward citizens' perspectives of current and future issues associated with social media platform governance, including concerns around the multiplicity of digital identities, consent for vulnerable groups and transparency in content moderation. The findings also reveal citizens' rationalization of the dilemmas faced in addressing these issues going forward, including tensions such as digital accountability vs data privacy, protection vs inclusion and algorithmic censorship vs free speech. Originality/value Based on outcomes from this dialogical process, moral actions in the form of policy recommendations are proposed by citizens and for citizens. The authors find that tackling these dark sides of digitalization is something too important to be left to "Big Tech" and equally requires an understanding of citizens' perspectives to ensure an informed and positive imprint for change.

Authenticity Governance and the Market for Social Media Engagements: The Shaping of Disinformation at the Peripheries of Platform Ecosystems

Unethical but not illegal! A critical look at two-sided disinformation platforms: Justifications, critique, and a way forward

Disinformation on digital media platforms: A market-shaping approach

BEYOND PERFORMATIVE TRANSPARENCY: LESSONS LEARNED FROM THE EU CODE OF PRACTICE ON DISINFORMATION

What drives digital engagement with sponsored videos? An investigation of video influencers' authenticity management strategies

Regulating Disinformation and Big Tech in the EU: A Research Agenda on the Institutional Strategies, Public Spheres and Analytical Challenges

Platform values and democratic elections: How can the law regulate digital disinformation?

Who Is Responsible for Disinformation? European Approaches to Social Platforms’ Accountability in the Post-Truth Era

The dark side of digitalization and social media platform governance: a citizen engagement study

Governance responses to disinformation

Authenticity under threat: When social media influencers need to go beyond self-presentation

The Impact of Information Authenticity on the Dissemination of News in Social Media

Co-opting Small Stories on Social Media: A Narrative Analysis of the Directive of Authenticity

Authentic isn't always best: When inauthentic social media influencers induce positive consumer purchase intention through inspiration

Disambiguating Disinformation: Extending Beyond the Veracity of Online Content

Consumers' ambiguous perceptions of advertising disclosures in influencer marketing: Disentangling the effects on current and future social media engagement

Influencer Self-Disclosure Practices on Instagram: A Multi-Country Longitudinal Study

Combating Disinformation and Misinformation through Source Identification and Tracking

Influence and Improvisation: Participatory Disinformation during the 2020 US Election

SocialTruth Project Approach to Online Disinformation (Fake News) Detection and Mitigation

Disinformation, Stochastic Harm, and Costly Effort: A Principal-Agent Analysis of Regulating Social Media Platforms