Abstract:This study identifies trends in disaster science research as well as knowledge gaps at a broad scale in order to help underpin and inform future research in the area. A numerical analysis of 58,106 peer-reviewed articles over four decades reveals key research themes and clusters, their temporal variation of activity as well as the influential studies that have played a key role in their development. Results indicate that what we recognize as contemporary disaster science has only shown discernible patterns of activity and knowledge foundation formation since the 1990s. Disaster research currently constitutes approximately 0.23% of all academic papers published per year. The initial and intermediate phases of the development of the field have been unsystematic and fragmented, with the focus of the field fluctuating for almost two decades until recently when research clusters have shown signs of stabilizing. It is observable that, over the last few years, more attention has been allocated to mitigation, response and recovery by focusing on issues such as the psychological impacts of disasters, reducing exposure to disasters and building community resilience to cope and recover from disasters. This is in contrast with earlier years where the focus was predominantly on preparedness and prevention. Research in different countries has been highly correlated with the types of disasters that occur in their regions, highlighting the relevance of the local situatedness and context in disaster research. The recent emergence and explosive growth of a research cluster linked to flood detection, flood mapping and flood hazard assessment is particularly notable, marking the sharpest growth of a single research cluster ever recorded in this field. A similar trend, though of a smaller magnitude, is observable in relation to research on wildfire hazard. Overall, flood-related research has proven one of the dominant themes, with multiple clusters detectable on the topic, each with their own distinguishable knowledge foundation (i.e., set of references). The pattern of collaboration among disaster researchers is shifting from predominantly domestic research towards international collaborations (currently reaching about 1/3 of all disaster-related papers each year), a sign of recognition to the value of cross-cultural and interdisciplinary perspectives in disaster research.

Pieces of an Inter‐Disciplinary Puzzle: Connecting Environmental Impact Assessment and Environmental Disaster Studies

The “Inter” Within Interdisciplinary Research: Strategies for Building Integration Across Fields

Interdisciplinary Perspectives: Fusing Artificial Intelligence with Environmental Science for Sustainable Solutions

Lost in Translation? Integrating Interdisciplinary Disaster Research with Policy Praxis

A Sharing Meanings Approach for Interdisciplinary Hazards Research

Intersectional feminism for the environmental studies and sciences: looking inward and outward

Environmental-Community Psychology in the Disaster Research: The Importance of Social-Spatial Connections

Studying Across: Anthropology, Conflict Transformation and Cultural Violence in Environmental Conflict

Design and Disaster Resilience: Toward a Role for Design in Disaster Mitigation and Recovery

Deep Ecology and Ecofeminism: Social Work to Address Global Environmental Crisis

Progress and landscape of disaster science: Insights from computational analyses

The Role of Transdisciplinary Approaches in Environmental Economics

Expanding Conservation Science through Emerging Interdisciplinary STEM Fields

Solidarity in disaster scholarship

Interdisciplinary Insights: Integrating Artificial Intelligence with Environmental Science for Sustainable Solutions

Disasters, community vulnerability, and poverty: The intersection between economics and emergency management

Exploring disaster ontologies from Chinese and Western perspectives: commonalities and nuances

Uncovering the Dynamics of Multi‐Sector Impacts of Hydrological Extremes: A Methods Overview

Of lakes and knowledges: between disciplinary enclosures and the pursuit of "full transdisciplinarity"

Emergency management and sustainability: Understanding the link between disaster and citizen participation for sustainability efforts and climate change

From Science to Policy and Practice: A Critical Assessment of Knowledge Management before, during, and after Environmental Public Health Disasters