Abstract:Scholars in the humanities rely on carefully-constructed prose to convey ideas, while many in the sciences deploy numerical precision instead. Although university administrators often tout multi- or inter-discipinarity, it is unclear whether there is a deep understanding of how these modes of investigation are different, and how those differences might be accommodated and supported. For example, the disciplines that use numbers as a chief mode of expression were from the beginning conceived, embodied with and configured for external assessment as part of their claims to authority. As a consequence, their metrics were not designed to assess other kinds of scholarship such as that of the arts and the humanities. And, read in the opposite direction, the fact that the humanities were never customised for those numerical-based controls should not be understood as a failing of the discipline, but as an integral dimension of its distinct practice. This contribution offers a study of documentary form in the academy. The discussion will examine how scholarship in different fields came to have different formal features. It will furthermore consider what the implications of these differences are for how the disciplines are now seen and assessed. By looking to the history and traditions of different forms of scholarship, this chapter seeks to offer insight into the current debates about how productivity and impact are to be defined, marked and assessed in the academy. This chapter introduces the possibility that humanistic research might be expressed in word or wood and investigates the consequences of such a provocation. It concerns itself with select dimensions of scholarly publication that are especially apparent from a perspective across wood and word-among them, peer review, assessment, dissemination, citation and ownership. Under the intensifying exigencies of documentation, components of the written document that were once provisional become obligatory and codified through practice. The foregoing discussion of a historically informed experiment in academic publishing raises for consideration how specific practices of knowledge have been legitimised over time. The moments of friction encountered by the Cabinet, Box and Article provide clues about how certain forms of knowledge gain traction over time. Conceiving publications as unique performances of meaning may stimulate alternative strategies of assessment, interpretation and dissemination that are cognisant of—and work in concert with—the diverse forms at issue.

Introduction to the special issue on Introducing bibliometrics in applied linguistics

Bibliometrics and scientometrics in applied linguistics: Epilogue to the special issue

A Bibliometric Analysis of Glottometrics

Bibliometrics: Methods for studying academic publishing

Interpreting Bibliometric Data

Editorial for the First Workshop on Mining Scientific Papers: Computational Linguistics and Bibliometrics

Professional and citizen bibliometrics: complementarities and ambivalences in the development and use of indicators—a state-of-the-art report

Bibliometric studies outside the information science and library science field: uncontainable or uncontrollable?

Bibliometrics, a useful tool within the field of research

Exploring Topics in Bibliometric Research Through Citation Networks and Semantic Analysis

The application of bibliometrics to research evaluation in the humanities and social sciences: An exploratory study using normalized Google Scholar data for the publications of a research institute

Professional and Citizen Bibliometrics: Complementarities and ambivalences in the development and use of indicators

Mapping Evaluation, Appraisal and Stance in Discourse (2000–2015): A Bibliometric Analysis

Usage Bibliometrics

In wood and word, or, a gloss on documents and documentation in the humanities

International Conferences of Bibliometrics

Bibliometrics: The Leiden Manifesto for research metrics

Science and its significant other: Representing the humanities in bibliometric scholarship

Bibliometrics as politics: the case of emerging disciplines

Bibliometrics and Information Retrieval: Creating Knowledge through Research Synergies

Usage Bibliometrics as a Tool to Measure Research Activity