Abstract:Although classical evolutionary theory, i.e., population genetics and the Modern Synthesis, was already implicitly ‘gene-centred’, the organism was, in practice, still generally regarded as the individual unit of which a population is composed. The gene-centred approach to evolution only reached a logical conclusion with the advent of the gene-selectionist or gene’s eye view in the 1960s and 1970s. Whereas classical evolutionary theory can only work with (genotypically represented) fitness differences between individual organisms, gene-selectionism is capable of working with fitness differences among genes within the same organism and genome. Here, we explore the explanatory potential of ‘intra-organismic’ and ‘intra-genomic’ gene-selectionism, i.e., of a behavioural-ecological ‘gene’s eye view’ on genetic, genomic and organismal evolution. First, we give a general outline of the framework and how it complements the—to some extent—still ‘organism-centred’ approach of classical evolutionary theory. Secondly, we give a more in-depth assessment of its explanatory potential for biological evolution, i.e., for Darwin’s ‘common descent with modification’ or, more specifically, for ‘historical continuity or homology with modular evolutionary change’ as it has been studied by evolutionary developmental biology (evo-devo) during the last few decades. In contrast with classical evolutionary theory, evo-devo focuses on ‘within-organism’ developmental processes. Given the capacity of gene-selectionism to adopt an intra-organismal gene’s eye view, we outline the relevance of the latter model for evo-devo. Overall, we aim for the conceptual integration between the gene’s eye view on the one hand, and more organism-centred evolutionary models (both classical evolutionary theory and evo-devo) on the other.

What Taking Development Seriously Means for Evolutionary Theory

Integrating Development and Evolution in Psychological Science: Evolutionary Developmental Psychology, Developmental Systems, and Explanatory Pluralism

The Extended Evolutionary Synthesis Facilitates Evolutionary Models of Culture Change

Why evolutionary biology needs anthropology: Evaluating core assumptions of the extended evolutionary synthesis

The significance and scope of evolutionary developmental biology: a vision for the 21st century

New thinking about biological evolution

The evosystem: A centerpiece for evolutionary studies

Darwinian Dynamics Implies Developmental Ascendency

Evolutionary Theory in the Administrative Sciences: Introduction

A critique for eco‐evolutionary dynamics

Toward Generalized Evolutionism: Beyond "generalized Darwinism" and Its Critics

The niche construction perspective: a critical appraisal

The Road Not Taken: What Developmental Psychology Might Learn From Darwin’s Insights Concerning Sexual Selection

Towards a Developmental Turn in Evolutionary Economic Geography?

An Evolutionary Framework for Culture: Selectionism versus Communal Exchange

On disagreements of theories of evolution

The Road Not Taken: What Developmental Psychology Might Learn From Darwin's Insights Concerning Sexual Selection

How deep do we have to go to rehabilitate evolutionary psychology? Reply to Bjorklund et al. (2022).

Individuality Through Ecology: Rethinking the Evolution of Complex Life From an Externalist Perspective

Theistic evolution and evolutionary ethics: Henry Fairfield Osborn and Huxley's legacy

The sociobiology of genes: the gene’s eye view as a unifying behavioural-ecological framework for biological evolution