Abstract:In addition to the previous intensive discussion on the "Data Deluge" with respect to enormous increase of available research data, the 2022 Internet-of-Things conference confirmed that in the near future there will be billions if not trillions of smart IoT devices in a very wide range of applications and locations, many of them with computational capacities. This large number of distributed IoT devices will create continuous streams of data that will require a global framework to facilitate their integration into the Internet to enable controlled access to their data and services, to name but a few aspects. This framework would enable tracking of these IoT devices to measure their resource usage for instance to globally address the UN Sustainable Development Goals. Additionally, policy makers are committed to define regulations to break data monopolies and increase sharing. The result will be an increasingly huge domain of accessible digital data which on the one hand allows addressing new challenges especially cross-sector ones. A key prerequisite for this is to find the right data across domain boundaries supporting a specific task.Digitisation is already being called the fourth industrial revolution and the emerging data and information is the 21st century's new resource. Currently this vision is mostly unrealised due to the inability of existing data and digital resources to be findable, accessible, interoperable, and reusable despite the progress in providing thematic catalogs. As a result, the capacity of this new resource is latent and mostly underutilized. There is no Internet level infrastructure that currently exists to facilitate the process by which all data and digital resources are made consistently and globally accessible. There are patchworks of localized and limited access to trusted data on the Internet created by specific communities that have been funded or directed to collaborate.To turn digital information into a commodity, description, access to, validation, and processing of data needs to become part of the Internet infrastructure we call the Global Integrated Data Space (GIDS). The main pillars of this approach require that data and services be globally identified and consistently accessed, with predictive descriptions and access control to make them globally findable.Currently researchers are relying partly on informal knowledge such as knowing the labs and persons to maximize the chance to access trustworthy data, but this method is limiting the use of suitable data. In the future data scenario, other mechanisms will become possible. In the public information space Google-like searches using specific key terms have become an accepted solution to find documents for human consumption. This approach however, does not work in the GIDS with large numbers of data contributors from a wide range of institutions, from millions of IoT devices worldwide, and where a wide range of data types and automatic data processing procedures dominate. Indeed, successful labs that apply complex models describing digital surrogates can automatically leverage data and data processing procedures from other labs. This makes the currently often operationally applied manual stitching of data and operations too costly both in time and resources to be a competitive option. A researcher looking for specific brain imaging data for a specific study has a few options:Rely on a network of colleagues.Execute Google-like searches in known registries looking for appropriate departments and researchers.Execute Google-like searches on suitable data.He/she engages an agent to execute profile matching in suitable sub-spaces.We assume that data creators will have the capability and be interested to create detailed metadata of different types and that the researchers, who are looking for specific data, will be able to specify precise profiles for data they are looking for. Two of the key characteristics of the future data space will be operations that can carry out profile matching at ultra-high speeds and that will lead to various subspaces according to some facets using self-organizing mechanisms. Of course, this poses high requirements on the metadata quality being used and that creators and potential consumers share knowledge about the semantic space in which they operate, and available semantic mappings used by brokers or self-provided. Metadata must be highly detailed and suitable schemas have been developed already in many communities. In addition to the usual metadata, potential users will need to specify their credentials in the form of trusted roles and their usage purposes to indicate access opportunities.Changing current metadata practices to yield richer metadata as presribed by the FAIR principles will not be simple, especially since we seem to be far away from formalizing roles and usage purposes in a broadly accepted way, but the pressure to create rich and s -Abstract Truncated-

The W3C Data Catalog Vocabulary, Version 2: Rationale, Design Principles, and Uptake

Constraints to Validate RDF Data Quality on Common Vocabularies in the Social, Behavioral, and Economic Sciences

Data Privacy Vocabulary (DPV) -- Version 2

Evaluating the Quality of RDF Data Sets on Common Vocabularies in the Social, Behavioral, and Economic Sciences

Datatractor: Metadata, automation, and registries for extractor interoperability in the chemical and materials sciences

PAV ontology: Provenance, Authoring and Versioning

The Research Data Alliance: Building Bridges to Enable Scientific Data Sharing

CatalogBank: A Structured and Interoperable Catalog Dataset with a Semi-Automatic Annotation Tool (DocumentLabeler) for Engineering System Design

Want to Describe and Share Biodiversity Inventory and Monitoring Data? The Humboldt Extension for Ecological Inventories Can Help!

A Capability Maturity Model for Urban Dataset Meta-data

The Translational Data Catalog - discoverable biomedical datasets

The Vision of the FAIR Digital Object Machine and Ubiquitous FDO Services

Framework to Automatically Determine the Quality of Open Data Catalogs

The FAIR Guiding Principles for scientific data management and stewardship

A Common Data Dictionary and Common Data Model for Additive Manufacturing

Updating Linked Data practices for FAIR Digital Object principles

Modeling community standards for metadata as templates makes data FAIR

From Raw Data to Data Standards through Quality Assessment and Semantic Annotation

In the Name of the Name: RDF literals, ER Attributes and the Potential to Rethink the Structures and Visualizations of Catalogs

Building a Disciplinary, World-Wide Data Infrastructure

Towards a Resource-Centric Data Network for Astronomy