A novel analytic approach to examine the relationship between APOE4 allele status and CSF complement‐related proteins and signaling pathways

Melissa Orenduff,David Sykes,Mary Cooter,Nader Morshed,Beth Stevens,Joseph E. Lucas,Michael W Lutz,Miles Berger
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/alz.083131
2023-12-01
Abstract:Abstract Background The mechanisms by which the APOE4 allele contributes to AD risk are unclear. Here, we tested the hypothesis that in cognitively normal adults, APOE4 allele is associated with a decrease in complement‐related proteins and downregulation of complement‐related pathways. Method Untargeted LC‐MS/MS proteomics was conducted on CSF samples (n = 118) from APOE3/3, APOE3/4 and APOE4/4 individuals over age 60, with groups matched on age and sex. We developed a novel analytic approach (which we term “up/down analysis”) based on the directional consistency of the β‐coefficients from a linear model for the intensities of peptides mapping to a given protein with respect to APOE4 carrier status ( APOE4 ‐/ APOE4 +). The analysis involves two steps: 1) The direction of the beta‐coefficient (positive/up or negative/down) for the level of each peptide (the outcome variable) due to APOE4 carrier status was derived from linear regression models adjusting for age, sex, and study. 2) These β‐coefficients were tallied for all peptides from a given protein (i.e. number of positive/up versus negative/down β‐coefficients). We then tested the probability under a binomial distribution that the distribution of up versus down peptides from each protein would be as, or more extreme than what we found, with a = 0.05. Pathway enrichment analysis (using p‐values from binomial tests) was conducted using GAGE and functional annotations based on KEGG. We used Benjamini‐Hochberg for multiple comparison correction. Result We found 158 proteins for which the direction of peptide intensity was consistently up (+β‐coefficient) or down (‐β‐coefficient) with respect to APOE4 status beyond what would be expected by chance. Of these 158 proteins, 37 were from the complement pathway. Pathway enrichment analysis further supports the role of the complement system; as the top differentially expressed pathway (FDR <0.05) was related to complement signaling. Conclusion Our results suggest that APOE4 carriers have lower CSF levels of key complement cascade proteins, which has previously been viewed as an indicator of complement activation. These results may provide insights into the mechanisms by which APOE4 and associated complement‐related proteins and signaling pathways ultimately contribute to increased AD risk.
clinical neurology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?