Abstract:Objective: In research, and particularly clinical trials, it is important to identify persons at high risk for developing Alzheimer’s Disease (AD), such as those with Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI). However, not all persons with this diagnosis have a high risk of AD as MCI can be broken down further into amnestic MCI (aMCI), who have a high risk specifically for AD, and non-amnestic MCI (naMCI), who are predominantly at risk for other dementias. People with aMCI largely differ from healthy controls and naMCI on memory tasks as it is the hallmark criteria for an amnestic diagnosis. Given the growing use of the NIH Toolbox Cognition battery in research trials, this project investigated which Toolbox Cognition measures best differentiated aMCI from naMCI and in comparison to persons with normal cognition. Participants and Methods: A retrospective data analysis was conducted investigating performance on NIH Toolbox Cognition tasks among 199 participants enrolled in the Michigan Alzheimer’s Disease Research Center. All participants were over age 50 (51-89 years, M=70.64) and had a diagnosis of aMCI (N=74), naMCI (N=24), or Normal Cognition (N=101). Potential demographic differences were investigated using chi-square and ANOVAs. Repeated measure general linear model was used to look at potential group differences in Toolbox Cognition performance, covarying for age which was statistically different in aMCI versus Normal participants. Linear regression was used to determine which cognitive abilities, as measured by the Uniform Data Set-3 (UDS3), might contribute to Toolbox differences noted in naMCI versus aMCI groups. Results: As expected, aMCI had lower Toolbox memory scores compared to naMCI (p=0.007) and Normals (p<0.001). Interestingly, naMCI had lower Oral Reading scores than both aMCI (p=0.008) and Normals (p<0.001). There were no other Toolbox performance differences between the MCI groups. 19.4% of the variance in Oral Reading scores was explained by performance on the following UDS3 measures: Benson delayed recall (inverse relationship) and backward digit span and phonemic fluency (positive relationship). Conclusions: In this study, Toolbox Picture Sequence Memory and Oral Reading scores differentiated aMCI and naMCI groups. While the difference in memory was expected, it was surprising that the naMCI group performed worse than the aMCI and normal groups on the Toolbox Oral Reading task, a task presumed to reflect Crystalized abilities resistive to cognitive decline. Results suggest that Oral Reading is primarily positively associated with working memory and executive tasks from the UDS3, but negatively associated with visual memory. It is possible that the Oral Reading subtest is sensitive to domains of deficit aside from memory that can best distinguish aMCI from naMCI. A better understanding of the underlying features in the Oral Reading task will assist in better characterizing deficit patterns seen in naMCI, making selection of aMCI participants more effective in clinical trials.

Comparing Clinical Diagnosis of Domains of Impairment in individuals with Mild Cognitive Impairment with the NIH Toolbox‐Cognitive Battery Performance

77 Differentiating Amnestic Versus Non-Amnestic Mild Cognitive Impairment Using the NIH Toolbox Cognition Battery

Mild Cognitive Impairment Subtype Performance in Comparison to Healthy Older Controls on the NIH Toolbox and Cogstate

Identification of amnestic mild cognitive impairment among Black and White community-dwelling older adults using NIH Toolbox Cognition tablet battery

Evaluating the factor structure and construct validity of the NIH toolbox in older adults, with a focus on cognitive normalcy and amnestic mild cognitive impairment: considerations for diversity, including insights from persons over 85 years of age and Black older Americans

Sensitivity of NIH Toolbox‐Cognition Battery task performance to amyloid positivity status in cognitively normal older adults

Measurement Invariance of the NIH Toolbox‐Cognition Battery Across Demographic Characteristics

A-235 Construct validity of the National Institutes of Health Toolbox- Cognition Battery (NIHTB-CB) in children and adolescents with cerebral cavernous malformation, type 1 (CCM-1) and their non-affected relatives

A promising cognitive screener in multiple sclerosis: The NIH toolbox cognition battery concords with gold standard neuropsychological measures

Construct validity of the NIH toolbox cognitive domains: A comparison with conventional neuropsychological assessments.

Domain specific cognitive impairment in Parkinson's patients with mild cognitive impairment

Exploring symptom clusters in mild cognitive impairment and dementia with the NIH Toolbox

Comparison of Cognitive Impairment Diagnosis Criteria in Clinical Settings: Conventional vs. Neuropsychological

Sensitivity of individual and composite test scores from the Cogstate Brief Battery to mild cognitive impairment and dementia due to Alzheimer’s disease

Validity of Web-based, Self-directed, NeuroCognitive Performance Test in MCI

Validating Frontal Memory‐related Neuromarkers for Mild Cognitive Impairment Using Identical Protocols in Two Racial and Culturally Distinct Cohorts

Comparing psychometric characteristics of a computerized cognitive test (BrainCheck Assess) against the Montreal cognitive assessment

Comparison of the neuropsychological characteristics of two subtypes of mild cognitive impairment

The Neuropsychological Profile of Mild Cognitive Impairment in Lewy Body Dementias

Conscious attention defect and inhibitory control deficit in Parkinson's Disease-Mild Cognitive Impairment: A comparison study with Amnestic Mild Cognitive Impairment multiple domain

The Distinct Roles Ofdifferent Memory Tests in Identifying Mild Cognitive Impairment