Abstract:Previous analyses of a large ensemble of stock markets have demonstrated that a log-periodic power law (LPPL) behavior of the prices constitutes a qualifying signature of speculative bubbles that often land with a crash. We detect such a LPPL signature in the foreign capital inflow during the bubble on the US markets culminating in March 2000. We detect a weak synchronization and lag with the NASDAQ LPPL pattern. We propose to rationalize these observations by the existence of positive feedback loops between market-appreciation/increased-spending/increased-deficit-of-balance-of-payment/larger-foreign-surplus/increased-foreign-capital-inflows and so on. Our analysis suggests that foreign capital inflow has been following rather than causing the bubble.We then combine a macroeconomic analysis of feedback processes occurring between the economy and the stock market with a technical analysis of more than 200 years of the DJIA to investigate possible scenarios for the future, three years after the end of the bubble and deep into a bearish regime. We conclude that the low interest rates and depreciating dollar are the indispensable ingredients for a lower sustainable burden of the global US debt structure and for allowing the slow rebuilding of an internationally competitive economy. This will probably be accompanied by a weak stock market on the medium term as the growing Federal deficit is consuming a large part of the foreign surplus dollars and the stock market is remaining a very risky and unattractive investment. Notwithstanding strong surge of liquidity in recent months orchestrated by the Federal Reserve, this macroeconomic analysis which incorporates an element of collective behavior is in line with our recent analyses of the bearish market that started in 2000 in terms of a LPPL “anti-bubble”. We project this LPPL anti-bubble to continue at least for another year. On the short term, increased availability of liquidity (M1) and self-fulfilling bullish anticipations may hold the stock market for a while.

Financial Deregulation, Monetary Tightening, Oil Crises and Transnational Capital Flows: The United States and the Origins of Neoliberal Financial Policies

U.S. outlook issues: putting America's house in order

Redesigning the International Monetary System. Intellectual Influences and the Return of the Special Drawing Rights: An Open Issue

Banking regulation in the United States after the world economic crisis of 2007/2008: economic immunity or false hopes

Policy Stability and Economic Growth: Lessons from the Great Recession

Deregulation As a Source of China's Economic Growth

Liquidity Preference, Interest Rate Spread, and the Transformation of the US Financial System

Inflation, Interest, and the Secular Rise in Wealth Inequality in the United States: Is the Fed Responsible?

Global Economy Rebalancing and U.S.Arbitrage

Evidence of fueling of the 2000 new economy bubble by foreign capital inflow: implications for the future of the US economy and its stock market

The Macro Economic Consequences of Republican Trade Policies

The Relations Among Loose Monetary Policy and the Housing Bubble and the Financial Crisis of 2008

Domestic policy choices, political institutional change, and financial globalization-super-1

Research on the Fulfillment of America's Supply Management Policies in 1980s——A Thought on Direction Change of China's Current Macro-Control

Domesticating Foreign Finance

American hegemony: intellectual property rights, dollar centrality, and infrastructural power

THE FEDERAL RESERVE’S MONETARY POLICY AND ITS EFFECTS (2008-2020): AN AUSTRIAN PERSPECTIVE

Stregthening Financial Risk Governance and Compliance in the U.S.: A Roadmap for Ensuring Economic Stability

Financial Repression is Knocking at the Door, Again

Financial Liberalization, Credit Market Dynamism, and Allocative Efficiency

From the Top–Down: The New Financial Architecture and the Re-embedding of Global Finance