Abstract:The fact that Amazon was allowed to acquire hundreds of companies as it rose to become the fourth most valuable U.S. company in terms of market capitalization and a leader in three lines of business has been viewed by some as damning evidence of underenforcement by the United States antitrust authorities. In this article we ask the obvious question: If the 2023 Guidelines had been in place instead of prior guidelines, what effects would they have had on Amazon's development? To provide an answer, we identify relevant changes in the guidelines and then select for review a subset of Amazon's 280 acquisitions over the period 1998 to 2022. In our counterfactual, we analyze five horizontal acquisitions, four vertical acquisitions, and two sets of serial acquisitions . We find that the 2023 Guidelines would have broadened the bases for potential challenges and thereby would have increased the likelihood that Amazon would have faced greater resistance from antitrust authorities. The lack of safe harbors, the plasticity of individual Guidelines, and the optionality to challenge mergers under alternative theories would have exposed most of Amazon's acquisitions to challenge. The lack of meaningful guidance about which individual transactions would have been challenged suggests that going forward enforcer discretion will play a yet larger role. Regarding Amazon's serial acquisitions of nearly one hundred technology firms, we find that the 2023 Guidelines would have provided multiple rationales for intervention. Therein lies a weakness in the Guidelines and in antitrust policy: the lack of a framework for assessing both the anticompetitive and procompetitive effects of such acquisitions in high-tech industries.

Mergers and acquisitions between online automobile-marketplace platforms: Responses by competition authorities in South Africa, Australia, and the United Kingdom

Which Mergers Should the European Commission Review under the Digital Markets Act?

Antitrust control of mergers and acquisitions: a case study of China

The New Digital Platforms: Merger Control in Pakistan

Price discrimination in merger review in South Africa: Implications of recent case precedent

Competition Policy in Media and Content Industry: Case Studies and Implications for Regulators

Analysis of Malaysian Competition Law and Policies in the E-Commerce Platforms Market

A Competition Law Assessment of Platform Most-Favoured-Customer Clauses

Empirical Analysis of Alibaba's Acquisition of NetEase Kaola

Mergers and Acquisitions in Africa: A Review and an Emerging Research Agenda

A 2020 perspective on "Opportunities or threats: The rise of online collaborative consumption (OCC) and its impact on new car sales".

Dog Eat Dog: Balancing Network Effects and Differentiation in a Digital Platform Merger

Entering the Digital Era - The Impact of Digital Technology-related M&As on Business Model Innovations of Automobile OEMs

Users’ opinions on telecom mergers and acquisitions in a developing country

Big Tech Acquisitions and the Potential Competition Doctrine: The Case of Facebook

Digital Platform Ecosystems and Conglomerate Mergers: A Review of the Brazilian Experience

Africa: An Emerging Context for Value Creation with Cross-Border Mergers and Acquisitions

Online Platforms and Digital Advertising Market Study: Observations on the Statement of Scope

The Reasons and Future Implications of Alibaba’s Acquisition of Yahoo China

Online Platforms and Digital Advertising Market Study: Observations on CMA’s Interim Report

A Counterfactual Analysis of Amazon's Acquisitions Under the 2023 Merger Guidelines