A bilevel optimisation model for the selection of parking and charging facilities for EV-based ride-hailing services
Pei-Yuan Hsu,E. Anastasiadis,Panagiotis Angeloudis,Qiming Ye,D. Ainalis
Abstract:Mobility as a Service (MaaS) and Park & Ride (P&R) initiatives are switfly gaining popularity around the world as remedial measures to reduce traffic congestion. These schemes have introduced major shifts in the interaction between travellers, transport infrastructure, and public transport schemes. Several initiatives that promote the use of MaaS schemes to reduce private usage already exist [Hesketh et al., 2017; Hellmann, 2014]. Their introduction has also coincided with the increasing uptake of Electric Vehicles (EVs). While EVs are more environmentally friendly [Uherek et al., 2010; Van Mierlo et al., 2006], they suffer from decreased range (80 to 300 miles [Transport for London, 2019a]) capabilities compared to conventional vehicles. Although current research efforts are primarily focused on new battery technologies to increase their range [Kouchachvili et al., 2018], they are still potentially many years away from widespread adoption. Charging speeds have been improving recently, but the number of rapid chargers available for use is limited. The average time needed to charge a typical EV according to the three most common charging levels (slow, fast, and rapid) are listed in Table 1. Although new charging facilities are being installed continuously, the growth in the number of EVs is currently surpassing the growth in the number of charging points [Environment Committee, 2018]. The issue intensifies if we take into consideration the charging demand by Transport Network Companies (TNC) fleet. Most ride-sharing fleet operators have plans to transition their fleets towards EVs in the near future, with many already operating a mix of conventional, hybrid and electric vehicles. The average distance travelled in a ride-sharing vehicle is around 1,000 miles per week [Takahashi, 2018], meaning that it needs recharging every 1-2 days. Adding up the time due to queue delays in charging points [Jung et al., 2014] the problem worsens. Therefore, to maintain the current level of convenience provided by MaaS, the supporting charging infrastructure needs to be sufficient to meet the demand. Across London there are around 2,000 charging points [Mayor of London, 2018] and 150 rapid charging points [Transport for London, 2019a]. In comparison, the number of EVs in the city is 12,000 [Environment Committee, 2018]. Considering that there are already more than 80,000 private hire vehicle licences [Transport for London, 2019b] and that TNCs aim to transition to fully EVs in the near future (e.g. Uber [Uber UK, 2018]), it is clear that the
Engineering,Environmental Science