Clinical Outcomes of a Novel Multidisciplinary Care Program in Advanced Kidney Disease (PEAK)
Daniil Shimonov,Sri Lekha Tummalapalli,Stephanie Donahue,Vidya Narayana,Sylvia Wu,Lisa S. Walters,Roberta Billman,Barbara Desiderio,Sandra Pressman,Oliver Fielding,Kariel Sweeney,Daniel Cukor,Daniel M. Levine,Thomas S. Parker,Vesh Srivatana,Jeffrey Silberzweig,Frank Liu,Andrew Bohmart
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ekir.2024.07.018
IF: 6.234
2024-07-26
Kidney International Reports
Abstract:Introduction Multi-disciplinary care (MDC) for late-stage chronic kidney disease (CKD) has been associated with improved patient outcomes compared with traditional nephrology care, but the optimal MDC model is unknown. In 2015, we implemented a novel MDC model for patients with late-stage CKD informed by the Chronic Care Model conceptual framework, including an expanded MDC team, care plan meetings, clinical risk prediction, and a patient dashboard. Methods We conducted a single-center, retrospective cohort study of adults with late-stage CKD (estimated glomerular filtration rate [eGFR] < 30 mL/min per 1.73m 2 ) enrolled from May 2015 to February 2020 in the Program for Education in Advanced Kidney disease (PEAK). Our primary composite outcome was an optimal transition to end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) defined as starting in-center hemodialysis (ICHD) as an outpatient with an arteriovenous fistula (AVF) or graft (AVG), or receiving home dialysis, or a pre-emptive kidney transplant. Secondary outcomes included home dialysis initiation, pre-emptive transplantation, vascular access at dialysis initiation, and location of ICHD initiation. We used logistic regression to examine trends in outcomes. Results were stratified by race, ethnicity, and insurance payor and compared with national and regional averages from the United States Renal Data System (USRDS) averaged from 2015 to 2019. Results Among 489 patients in the PEAK program, 37 (8%) died prior to ESKD and 151 (31%) never progressed to ESKD. Of the 301 (62%) patients who progressed to ESKD, 175 (58%) achieved an optimal transition to ESKD, including 54 (18%) peritoneal dialysis, 16 (5%) home hemodialysis, and 36 (12%) preemptive transplant. Of the 195 (65%) patients starting ICHD, 51% started with an AVF or AVG and 52% started as an outpatient. The likelihood of starting home dialysis increased by 1.34 times per year from 2015 to 2020 (95% CI 1.05 – 1.71, p = 0.018) in multivariable adjusted results. Optimal transitions to ESKD and home dialysis rates were higher than national USRDS data (58% vs. 30%; 23% vs. 11%) across patient race, ethnicity, and payor. Conclusions Patients enrolled in a novel comprehensive MDC model coupled with risk prediction and health information technology were nearly twice as likely to achieve an optimal transition to ESKD and start dialysis at home, compared with national averages.
urology & nephrology