Abstract:Introduction: The most frequent internal instability of the knee is a meniscal tear. Most cost-effective and the primary diagnostic method is a physical examination of the knee joint. MRI is a non-invasive and extremely sensitive method of study and it frequently detects subtle and early alterations in the soft tissues. Arthroscopy is a highly specific and sensitive method which is useful for both diagnosis and treatment but it is an invasive treatment. Objective 1. To assess the accuracy for clinical examination and arthroscopy to diagnose the anterior cruciate ligament and meniscal injuries in knee joint. 2. To examine how accurate MRI is, as compared to arthroscopy in diagnosing anterior cruciate ligament and meniscal injuries in knee. 3. Anassociation of diagnostic accuracy of MRI and clinical examination in diagnosis of anterior cruciate ligament and meniscal injuries in knee joint. Material and Methods: A Cross-sectional study conducted at Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Services Institute of Medical Sciences (SIMS). This study completed in one year and two months after the acceptance of synopsis. A sample of 120 patients was calculated for this study. A clinical diagnosis of meniscal, posterior cruciate ligament, anterior cruciate ligament, lateral collateral ligament, and medial collateral ligament injury of the knee has made after these patients gave their up-to-date consent. These patients were evaluated on the basis of MRI and Arthroscopy. We used SPSS to evaluate all data, with arthroscopy serving as the gold standard. Results: The study contained 120 patients. The mean age of these patients is between 30.8 ± 6.93 years. Most of the patients are male. The most common ligament involved in this study found to be ACL followed by medial Meniscal injury. Findings from clinical examination are correlated with Arthroscopic findings and it found more sensitive for ACL injuries (97.5%) while it is most specific for ACL as well as Medial Meniscal injuries (100%). Findings from MRI are also correlate with Arthroscopy, MRI found most sensitive to detect ACL injuries (95.8%) and it is most specific for ACL injuries also (100%). We also compare the MRI findings with clinical examination finding and found that, clinical examination is almost equally accurate as MRI to detect the injuries of ACL injuries with sensitivity of clinical examination 97.5% and MRI 95.8% and found 100% for ACL injuries. Conclusion: We concluded that the clinical examination is batter for diagnosing cruciate ligamentous injury while MRI is batter for diagnosis of meniscal injury, in case of knee injuries. So we may skip MRI for patients with cruciate injury &directly proceed towards arthroscopy. In difficult cases and the cases which are involving meniscal injury both MRI and arthroscopy may be considered. Keywords: Meniscal tear; MRI; Arthroscopy; knee joint; clinical examination.

Correlation between Clinical Examination, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, and Arthroscopy in Meniscal Injuries of the Knee: A Prospective Cohort Study

Comparison of Clinical, Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) and Arthroscopic Findings in Assessment of Cartilage Defects and Internal Derangement of Knee

Comparison of clinical examination & MRI against arthroscopy in diagnosis of Meniscal and anterior cruciate ligament injuries of knee joint

The International Society of Arthroscopy, Knee Surgery and Orthopaedic Sports Medicine classification of knee meniscus tears: three-dimensional MRI and arthroscopy correlation

To Assess the Utility of MRI in Menisci and Ligamentous Injuries of Knee in Correlation with Arthrosopy

Clinical Diagnostic Value of Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Knee Joint Sports Injury

MRI efficacy in diagnosing internal lesions of the knee: a retrospective analysis

The association of the medial meniscus covering ratio with knee cartilage thickness at 15 medial compartment subregions as found by three-dimensional analysis using MRI

Clinical considerations of anatomy and magnetic resonance imaging in pediatric meniscus tear, with imaging-based treatment options

Comparison of Accuracy in Expert Clinical Examination versus Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Arthroscopic Exam in Diagnosis of Meniscal Tear

MRI Diagnosis of Meniscal Injuries of the Knee:Correlated with Arthroscopy

Diagnostic values of 3 methods for evaluating meniscal healing status after meniscal repair: comparison among second-look arthroscopy, clinical assessment, and magnetic resonance imaging.

Comparison of the Relativity of MRI Appearance of Cartilage Injuries and Postoperative Effect of Arthroscope on Articular Cartilage Disease of Knee

Value of History, Physical Examination, and Radiographic Findings in the Diagnosis of Symptomatic Meniscal Tear Among Middle‐Aged Subjects With Knee Pain

Evaluation of the relationship between Knee Osteoarthritis and Meniscus Pathologies

Correlation between meniscal extrusion and symptom duration, alignment, and arthritic changes in medial meniscus posterior root tear: research article

The Role of Magnetic Resonance Imaging in the Evaluation of Knee Pain

Knee MRI: Meniscus Roots, Ramps, Repairs, and Repercussions

The investigation and significance of the radial displacement of meniscus in knee joint

Characterization of knee meniscal pathology: correlation of gross, histologic, biochemical, molecular, and radiographic measures of disease

Bony morphology of the knee and non-traumatic meniscal tears: Is there a role for meniscal impingement?