Mesial temporal resection following long‐term ambulatory intracranial EEG monitoring with a direct brain‐responsive neurostimulation system
Lawrence J. Hirsch,Emily A. Mirro,Vicenta Salanova,Thomas C. Witt,Cornelia N. Drees,Mesha‐Gay Brown,Ricky W. Lee,Toni L. Sadler,Elizabeth A. Felton,Paul Rutecki,Hae Won Shin,Eldad Hadar,Manu Hegde,Vikram R. Rao,Lilit Mnatsakanyan,Deepak S. Madhavan,Tarek J. Zakaria,Anli A. Liu,Christianne N. Heck,Janet E. Greenwood,Jeffrey K. Bigelow,Dileep R. Nair,Andreas V. Alexopoulos,Michael Mackow,Jonathan C. Edwards,Nadia Sotudeh,Ruben I. Kuzniecky,Ryder P. Gwinn,Michael J. Doherty,Eric B. Geller,Martha J. Morrell
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/epi.16442
IF: 6.74
2020-03-01
Epilepsia
Abstract:<section class="article-section__content"><h3 class="article-section__sub-title section1"> Objective</h3><p>To describe seizure outcomes in patients with medically refractory epilepsy who had evidence of bilateral mesial temporal lobe (MTL) seizure onsets and underwent MTL resection based on chronic ambulatory intracranial EEG (ICEEG) data from a direct brain‐responsive neurostimulator (RNS) system.</p></section><section class="article-section__content"><h3 class="article-section__sub-title section1"> Methods</h3><p>We retrospectively identified all patients at 17 epilepsy centers with MTL epilepsy who were treated with the RNS System using bilateral MTL leads, and in whom an MTL resection was subsequently performed. Presumed lateralization based on routine presurgical approaches was compared to lateralization determined by RNS System chronic ambulatory ICEEG recordings. The primary outcome was frequency of disabling seizures at last 3‐month follow‐up after MTL resection compared to seizure frequency 3 months before MTL resection.</p></section><section class="article-section__content"><h3 class="article-section__sub-title section1"> Results</h3><p>We identified 157 patients treated with the RNS System with bilateral MTL leads due to presumed bitemporal epilepsy. Twenty‐five patients (16%) subsequently had an MTL resection informed by chronic ambulatory ICEEG (mean = 42 months ICEEG); follow‐up was available for 24 patients. After MTL resection, the median reduction in disabling seizures at last follow‐up was 100% (mean: 94%; range: 50%‐100%). Nine patients (38%) had exclusively unilateral electrographic seizures recorded by chronic ambulatory ICEEG and all were seizure‐free at last follow‐up after MTL resection; eight of nine continued RNS System treatment. Fifteen patients (62%) had bilateral MTL electrographic seizures, had an MTL resection on the more active side, continued RNS System treatment, and achieved a median clinical seizure reduction of 100% (mean: 90%; range: 50%‐100%) at last follow‐up, with eight of fifteen seizure‐free. For those with more than 1 year of follow‐up (N = 21), 15 patients (71%) were seizure‐free during the most recent year, including all eight patients with unilateral onsets and 7 of 13 patients (54%) with bilateral onsets.</p></section><section class="article-section__content"><h3 class="article-section__sub-title section1"> Significance</h3><p>Chronic ambulatory ICEEG data provide information about lateralization of MTL seizures and can identify additional patients who may benefit from MTL resection.</p></section>
clinical neurology