Identification of risk loci for postpartum depression in a genome‐wide association study

Xue Li,Nagahide Takahashi,Akira Narita,Yukako Nakamura,Mika Sakurai‐Yageta,Keiko Murakami,Mami Ishikuro,Taku Obara,Masahiro Kikuya,Fumihiko Ueno,Hirohito Metoki,Hisashi Ohseto,Ippei Takahashi,Tomohiro Nakamura,Noriko Warita,Tomoka Shoji,Zhiqian Yu,Chiaki Ono,Natsuko Kobayashi,Saya Kikuchi,Tasuku Matsuki,Fuji Nagami,Soichi Ogishima,Junichi Sugawara,Tetsuro Hoshiai,Masatoshi Saito,Nobuo Fuse,Kengo Kinoshita,Masayuki Yamamoto,Nobuo Yaegashi,Norio Ozaki,Gen Tamiya,Shinichi Kuriyama,Hiroaki Tomita
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/pcn.13731
2024-09-19
Psychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences
Abstract:Aim Genome‐wide association studies (GWAS) of postpartum depression (PPD) based on accumulated cohorts with multiple ethnic backgrounds have failed to identify significantly associated loci. Herein, we conducted a GWAS of Japanese perinatal women along with detailed confounding information to uncover PPD‐associated loci. Methods The first and second cohorts (n = 9260 and n = 8582 perinatal women enrolled in the Tohoku Medical Megabank Project) and the third cohort (n = 997), recruited at Nagoya University, underwent genotyping. Of them, 1421, 1264, and 225 were classified as PPD based on the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale 1 month after delivery. The most influential confounding factors of genetic liability to PPD were selected, and logistic regression analyses were performed to evaluate genetic associations with PPD after adjusting for confounders. Results A meta‐analysis of GWAS results from the three cohorts identified significant associations between PPD and the following loci (P
neurosciences,psychiatry,clinical neurology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?