Biased allosteric modulation of formyl peptide receptor 2 leads to distinct receptor conformational states for pro- and anti-inflammatory signaling

Shuo Zhang,Hao Gong,Yunjun Ge,Richard D Ye,Richard D. Ye
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.phrs.2020.105117
IF: 10.334
2020-11-01
Pharmacological Research
Abstract:<h3 class="u-h4 u-margin-m-top u-margin-xs-bottom">Background and purpose</h3><p>Formyl peptide receptor 2 (FPR2) is a Class A G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) that interacts with multiple ligands and transduces both proinflammatory and anti-inflammatory signals. These ligands include weak agonists and modulators that are produced during inflammation. The present study investigates how prolonged exposure to FPR2 modulators influence receptor signaling.</p><h3 class="u-h4 u-margin-m-top u-margin-xs-bottom">Experimental approach</h3><p>Fluorescent biosensors of FPR2 were constructed based on single-molecule fluorescent resonance energy transfer (FRET) and used for measurement of ligand-induced receptor conformational changes. These changes were combined with FPR2-mediated signaling events and used as parameters for the conformational states of FPR2. Ternary complex models were developed to interpret ligand concentration-dependent changes in FPR2 conformational states.</p><h3 class="u-h4 u-margin-m-top u-margin-xs-bottom">Key results</h3><p>Incubation with Ac<sub>2−26</sub>, an anti-inflammatory ligand of FPR2, decreased FRET intensity at picomolar concentrations. In comparison, WKYMVm (W-pep) and Aβ<sub>42</sub>, both proinflammatory agonists of FPR2, increased FRET intensity. Preincubation with Ac<sub>2−26</sub> at 10 pM diminished W-pep-induced Ca<sup>2+</sup> flux but potentiated W-pep-stimulated β-arrestin2 membrane translocation and p38 MAPK phosphorylation. The opposite effects were observed with 10 pM of Aβ<sub>42</sub>. Neither Ac<sub>2−26</sub> nor Aβ<sub>42</sub> competed for W-pep binding at the picomolar concentrations.</p><h3 class="u-h4 u-margin-m-top u-margin-xs-bottom">Conclusions and implications</h3><p>The results support the presence of two allosteric binding sites on FPR2, each for Ac<sub>2−26</sub> and Aβ<sub>42</sub>, with high and low affinities. Sequential binding of the two allosteric ligands at increasing concentrations induce different conformational changes in FPR2, providing a novel mechanism by which biased allosteric modulators alter receptor conformations and generate pro- and anti-inflammatory signals.</p>
pharmacology & pharmacy
What problem does this paper attempt to address?