Antibody landscape against SARS-CoV-2 reveals significant differences between non-structural/accessory and structural proteins

Yang Li,Zhaowei Xu,Qing Lei,Dan-Yun Lai,Hongyan Hou,He-Wei Jiang,Yun-Xiao Zheng,Xue-Ning Wang,Jiaoxiang Wu,Ming-Liang Ma,Bo Zhang,Hong Chen,Caizheng Yu,Jun-Biao Xue,Hai-Nan Zhang,Huan Qi,Shu-Juan Guo,Yandi Zhang,Xiaosong Lin,Zongjie Yao,Huiming Sheng,Ziyong Sun,Feng Wang,Xionglin Fan,Sheng-Ce Tao,Dan-yun Lai,He-wei Jiang,Yun-xiao Zheng,Xue-ning Wang,Ming-liang Ma,Jun-biao Xue,Hai-nan Zhang,Shu-juan Guo,Sheng-ce Tao
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.celrep.2021.109391
IF: 8.8
2021-07-01
Cell Reports
Abstract:The immunogenicity of the SARS-CoV-2 proteome is largely unknown, especially for non-structural proteins and accessory proteins. In this study, we collect 2,360 COVID-19 sera and 601 control sera. We analyze these sera on a protein microarray with 20 proteins of SARS-CoV-2, building an antibody response landscape for immunoglobulin (Ig)G and IgM. Non-structural proteins and accessory proteins NSP1, NSP7, NSP8, RdRp, ORF3b, and ORF9b elicit prevalent IgG responses. The IgG patterns and dynamics of non-structural/accessory proteins are different from those of the S and N proteins. The IgG responses against these six proteins are associated with disease severity and clinical outcome, and they decline sharply about 20 days after symptom onset. In non-survivors, a sharp decrease of IgG antibodies against S1 and N proteins before death is observed. The global antibody responses to non-structural/accessory proteins revealed here may facilitate a deeper understanding of SARS-CoV-2 immunology.
cell biology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?