Abstract:Background context Pedicle screw-rod assembly procedures following pedicle screw insertion include contouring and placing rods into screw tulips, introducing set screws into the tulip along the screw thread, applying a counter-torque holder and tightening all the set screws clockwise. Even if an appropriate pedicle screw is implanted, screw dislodgement after tightening of the tulip and set screw is not uncommon. Pedicle wall violation resulting from excessive rotational force due to inadequate use of a counter-torque holder might be the reason. However, the strain change in the pedicle during tulip-set screw tightening and the role of counter-torque have never been investigated. Purpose This study determined differences in the strain change in the outer and inner pedicle walls during tulip-set screw tightening; additionally, the influence of counter-torque on pedicle wall violation was elucidated. Study design A controlled biomechanical study; the strain values of outer and inner pedicle walls in cadaveric porcine L4-L5 vertebrae during tulip-set screw tightening with or without a counter-torque holder were measured. Methods Twelve L4-L5 fresh-frozen porcine lumbar vertebrae were implanted with screw-rod constructs; the set screw was randomly locked into the tulip in the right L5, right L4, left L5 and left L4 testing groups. The maximal values from eight strain gauges (P-R-O: outer cortex of right pedicle in proximal vertebra; P-R-I: inner cortex of right pedicle in proximal vertebra; D-R-O: outer cortex of right pedicle in distal vertebra; D-R-I: inner cortex of right pedicle in distal vertebra; P-L-O: outer cortex of left pedicle in proximal vertebra; P-L-I: inner cortex of left pedicle in proximal vertebra; D-L-O: outer cortex of left pedicle in distal vertebra; D-L-I: outer cortex of left pedicle in proximal vertebra) for each specimen during tightening to 12 Nm were measured. Results The maximal strain values of the ipsilateral strain gauges in all testing groups were almost significantly higher when a counter-torque holder was not used than when one was used. The strain values in the adjacent pedicle of specimens without a counter-torque holder were significantly increased: P-R-O and P-R-I in the right L5 group; D-R-I in the right L4 group; P-L-I and P-L-O in the left L5 group; D-L-O and D-L-I in the left L4 group. Conclusions The constraint effect of counter-torque during tulip-set screw tightening is necessary. Clockwise rotational force with a fragile lateral pedicle wall suggests that caution is required when using a counter-torque holder to tighten the right L5 and left L4 constructs. Clinical significance A counter-torque holder is important during tulip-set screw tightening; improper use may lead to adjacent pedicle wall violation, sequentially resulting in pedicle screw loosening.

The role of counter-torque holder in the tightening of pedicle screw-rod constructs: a biomechanical study in a porcine model.

Morpho-metrological Study of Thoracical Verterbral Pedicle Rib Unit and Thoracical Pedicle on CT Scans

Biomechanical comparison of pedicle screw fixation strength among three different screw trajectories using single vertebrae and one-level functional spinal unit

Biomechanical Comparison of Fixation Stability among Various Pedicle Screw Geometries: Effects of Screw Outer/Inner Projection Shape and Thread Profile

Influence of various pilot hole profiles on pedicle screw fixation strength in minimally invasive and traditional spinal surgery: a comparative biomechanical study

Craniocaudal cyclic load improve risk assessment of lumbar pedicle screw loosening：finite element analysis based on computer tomography

Evaluation of the reduction, tightening and gripping performance of an innovative set screw technology for instrumented posterior lumbar fusion: A biomechanical study

Impact of screw tip design on screw anchorage: mechanical testing and numerical simulation

A Study of Screw Placement to Obtain the Optimal Pull-out Resistance of Lumbar Pedicle Screws—analysis of Hounsfield Units Measurements Based on Computed Tomography

Pedicle screw "hubbing" in the immature thoracic spine: a biomechanical and micro-computed tomography evaluation

Comprehensive In Silico Evaluation of Accessory Rod Position, Rod Material and Diameter, Use of Cross-connectors, and Anterior Column Support in a Pedicle Subtraction Osteotomy Model: Part II: Effects on Lumbosacral Rod and Screw Strain

Biomechanical Properties of Novel Porous Scaffold Core and Hollow Lateral Hole Pedicle Screws: A Comparative Study in Bama Pigs

A Novel Screw Modeling Approach to Study the Effects of Screw Parameters on Pullout Strength.

Biomechanical Analysis of Pedicle Screw Reinsertion Along the Same Trajectory in a Validated 3D-Printed Synthetic Bone Model

Effectiveness of L5 pedicle screw insertion with a minimally invasive method

Optimizing Lumbar Pedicle Screw Trajectory Utilizing a 3D-Printed Drill Guide to Ensure Placement of Pedicle Screws Into Higher Density Bone May Improve Pedicle Screw Pullout Resistance

Stability Of Medially And Laterally Malpositioned Screws: A Biomechanical Study On Cadavers

Biomechanical comparative study of midline cortical vs. traditional pedicle screw trajectory in osteoporotic bone

Biomechanical effects of posterior lumbar interbody fusion with vertical placement of pedicle screws compared to traditional placement

Analysis of the stress of pedicle screw instrument

Comprehensive Evaluation of Accessory Rod Position, Rod Material and Diameter, Use of Cross-connectors, and Anterior Column Support in a Pedicle Subtraction Osteotomy Model: Part I: Effects on Apical Rod Strain: An In Vitro and In Silico Biomechanical Study