Virginia Woolf's Mythical Method
Fen Gao
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5325/style.57.2.0225
2023-01-01
Style
Abstract:Amy C. Smith’s Virginia Woolf’s Mythical Method is a multiperspective monograph, promoting Virginia Woolf’s mythic study through an organic combination of mythical, political, feministic, and aesthetic analyses. Smith intends to revive “the study of myth in Woolf’s work by showing that Woolf mythic method is a primary aesthetic vehicle for expressing critical views about the role of modern epistemological and metaphysical assumptions in social structure” (3), and makes possible a revealing of Woolf’s distinctive mythic method, aesthetic structure, feminist innovation, and political critique. It reframes its arguments in the contexts of the latest mythic and feminist scholarship and helps deepen our understanding of Virginia Woolf.Unlike some other Woolf mythic studies, which merely focus on myth in Woolf fiction or influence of Jane Harrison’s scholarship on Woolf, Smith takes a feminist-based mythic-political critical approach, full of challenging thinking. Smith clarifies in the “Introduction” that Woolf’s mythic method is “paratactic” (4), and she analyzes its connotations from several different perspectives. Firstly, Woolf’s paratactic mythic method reflects her feminist vision, which regards myth as “a powerful disordered and disordering influence and to prioritize the indeterminate style of oral literature” (2), and it is absolutely different from T. S. Eliot’s “controlling and ordering” (2) mythical method. Secondly, it fits modernist aesthetics, which emphasizes the disruption of hierarchy, fragmentation, and the reader’s active construction of meaning, presenting ideas, and events in equilibrium without providing logical connections. Thirdly, it resists one-to-one correspondences between characters and figures from myth, and its mythic allusions are not singular or linear, but multiple and contradictory. Fourthly, it reveals Woolf’s critique of rational materialism prevailing at the time and Woolf’s political vision, through her adaption and revision of Greek myth and her intersection and disordering of mythic structures. All these connotations are discussed in five chapters in detail, focusing on the characters in Mrs. Dalloway, To the Lighthouse, and Between the Acts and their allusive association with three groups of mythic figures, namely the Mother Goddess, deities associated with the Thesmophoria and Eleusinian mysteries and myth, and vegetation gods including Dionysus. The structure of the monograph itself is paratactic, similar to Woolf’s mythic method, which parallels Woolf’s mythic vision with her political vision in each chapter, displaying both Woolf’s aesthetic innovation and humanistic critique.In her first chapter, “Clarissa’s Eleusinian Desires,” Smith analyzes Woolf’s two revisions of the Eleusinian Mysteries and the Thesmophoria and the Homeric Hymn to Demeter in Mrs. Dalloway. Smith holds that Woolf is aware of the difficulties of replanting archaic values and social structure into the modern world; she, therefore, revises the Homeric Hymn in two ways. Firstly, she changes the Hymn’s portrayal of female community and their emotionally intimate relationships into a spiritual women’s community organized around lesbian relationships by focusing on Artemis, a minor character in the Hymn. Secondly, she changes the Hymn’s portrayal of female community as cooperative and ethical in comparison to a violent and dominating patriarchal presence into a mature woman’s (Mrs. Dalloway) “critique of patriarchy, Empire and the class structure that led to the war” (26). To Smith, Woolf creates a kaleidoscopic allusion to the Hymn and its accompanying rituals, rather than a one-to-one correspondence between Woolf’s characters and the Eleusinian figures, and she destabilizes her mythic references by alluding to both Persephone and Artemis, goddesses who combine death with fertility in different ways. Smith believes that through revising the mythic figures and emphasizing paradox and inconsistency in matrifocal material, Woolf forms a paratactic presentation of archaic myth, which not only develops a complex understanding of the relationship between feminism and archaic myth, but also provides a powerful critique of imperialist, capitalist, and patriarchal modes of relation.In the second chapter, “Septimus’s Dionysian Sacrifice,” Smith argues that Septimus in Mrs. Dalloway is described not as a figure of insanity but a symbol associated with Dionysus and other vegetation gods, who embodies “irrationality in a broader sense that poses deeper challenges to modernity” (51). Woolf presents her mythic vision through allusions to the dying and reborn vegetation god in Septimus, demonstrating the conflicted interdependence of rationality and irrationality in modernity and the dangers of attempting to diminish the irrational. Smith believes that Woolf establishes her vision through revising the motif of dying and reborn vegetation god theorized by Harrison and Frazer, as she does with the Homeric Hymn to Demeter, to emphasize in Septimus “a Nietzschean vision of unity with nature, sacrifice and culture renewal that specifically targets modern rationality” (56). To Smith, what is important is that Woolf balances a respect for the mythic cognition with a critical perspective on naïve celebrations of the archaic irrational, and her critique of modernity, rationalism, and anti-rationalism recalls an appropriate view that “civilization requires the interweaving dance of rational and irrational to develop” (67). In general, Woolf’s allusions to Dionysus and Nietzsche’s Dionysian principle in Septimus are paratactic, which suggests “both the promise of a return to the archaic irrational and the limits of such a return” (68).The third chapter, “Peter Walsh’s Primitivist Odyssey,” examines the mythic realm of Peter Walsh in his primitivist fantasies of goddesses in Mrs. Dalloway. In the novel, Peter Walsh’s journey across London resembles Odysseus’s voyage home in his primitivist fantasies of women and preoccupation with British civilization, and by linking Peter with Odysseus Woolf highlights the mutual dependence of imperialism and primitivism. The mythic paratactic vision is presented through paralleling Peter’s primitivist fantasies of women into supernatural fullness and exotic relief with Peter’s explicit critiques of British imperialism and militarism. Smith illustrates that Woolf satirizes Peter’s “unwillingness to recognize that feminine domesticity and primitivism he celebrates support the masculine imperialism he criticizes” (23), which arouses our attention to the fascination of some Western artists “with non-Western cultures as a lost paradise in contrast to repressive European modernity” (74). In contrast to some avant-garde primitivists, who appropriate primitive cultures to reinforce Western superiority, Woolf understands the primitive myths as something exceeding, which may help bring real change.The fourth chapter “The Goddess in the Lighthouse” further discusses Woolf’s mythic method in To the Lighthouse, with shifting and competing visions of the Great Goddess as the core. Smith indicates that Woolf’s paratactic mythic method in To the Lighthouse is presented through “a tension within feminism regarding matrifocal societies and the Great Goddess” (91). Woolf disorders her portrayal of Mrs. Ramsay by arranging divergent mythic figures so that at times Mrs. Ramsay suggesting Demeter, and at others Artemis, Hera, Athena, Aphrodite, or even Persephone, and each goddess associated with Mrs. Ramsay is multifaceted. This unstable paratactic structure of allusion in the characterization of Mrs. Ramsay reflects both the structure of myth generally and Harrison’s theory of a common ancestress that lies behind several of the goddesses in the Greek pantheon. Smith argues that “the most accurate mythic parallel to Mrs. Ramsay is not any particular goddess but rather the broader Great Goddess” (99), and Woolf’s critical application of Harrison’s theory highlights the problematic historical links between the nineteenth century Victorian rational theories of matriarchy and feminism. Smith emphasizes that Woolf calls into question the wisdom of adopting Victorian idealization of femininity as a source of feminist liberation, and Woolf’s mythic irruption in the projection of goddess imagery “both supports and challenges rationalist modernity” (23).The final chapter, “Harmonious Discord in Between the Acts” offers a discussion of Woolf’s “mythic resistance to fascist structures of thought” (23) in her novel Between the Acts. Smith argues that Woolf fully implements her paratactic mythic method in this novel and links it closely to her political critique. Woolf’s paratactic method particularly presents in her adaptation of the choral passage from Greek tragedy and her indirect, piecemeal, and contradictory allusions to archaic myth in the novel, and these adaptations play an effective role in destabilizing meaning of the novel. Such a destabilized expressive style indicates Woolf’s challenge to the hegemony characteristic of fascism, and Woolf’s refusal to resolve the tension between unity and dispersal constitutes her powerful critique of exclusionary and oppressive social identities, which merely offer a tentative and ostensible vision of harmony and integration.Virginia Woolf’s Mythical Method is profound and valuable. Its profoundness is reflected in the fact that it does not confine its mythic study to limited analysis of mythic influence, method, structure, and thought, but goes deep into the conflict, fusion, and reconstruction of mythical, feminist, and patriarchal thoughts in Woolf’s novels. It is a multiple-perspective study, with an intricate structure of feministic and political critique at play and mythic method lying at the heart. “Paratactic” is the most important and innovative keyword in Smith’s monograph, which embraces differences to keep the harmonious, in common with Chinese Confucius saying “harmony in diversity.” It is Woolf’s core idea, which is worthy of a full and deep interpretation.