Human Resource Development Practices in U.S. Enterprises in Russia: A Literature Review
Maria S. Plakhotnik
Abstract:This study investigated human resource development (HRD) in Russian enterprises, U.S. firms in Russia, or U.S.-Russian joint ventures. Thirty-three articles were selected through a database search and examined using content analysis. Emerging themes included workers’ knowledge and skills, training practices, organizational involvement, responsibility, and communication, and leadership styles. Since the collapse of the Soviet empire, Russia has been attracting foreign investors and businesses. The number of U.S. businesses operating in Russia increased from a couple of dozen in 1991 to several hundred in 1996 (Thach, 1996). In 2001, the U.S. was the biggest foreign investor in Russia with 5 billion dollars in direct investments and 10 billion dollars in two-way trade of goods and services (Evans, 2001). The interest has extended from Russia’s rich natural resources to its hardly competitive market and cheap but skilled labor (Fey, 1995). Success of foreign firms and joint ventures in Russia depends on the people working for them, but the areas of human resource development and human resource management represent challenges. The concept of human resources called “kadri” or cadre differed during the Soviet era. The system of K-12 and post-secondary education was well-developed and considered sufficient to prepare a qualified workforce. Therefore, on-the-job development was given little attention (Fey, Engstrom, & Bjorkman, 1999; Thach, 1996). Since the average Russian employee knew a little about market economy, Western consulting firms and partnerships on academic and practitioner levels were established to provide help to various aspects of business. Fey et al. (1999) found over 20 foreign firms in Moscow offer training seminars and consultations, some Russian firms send their top managers abroad, and many develop in-house training courses. However, the effectiveness of Western-based programs for employee development has been questioned since they often offer “quick-fix packages and ‘canned’ prescriptions” and lack three crucial components: “(a) pre-training preparation ..., (b) knowledgeable trainers ..., and (c) an in-depth understanding of the intricacies unique to the Russian business culture” (May,Young, & Ledgerwood, 1998, p. 450). Employees’ job performance and behavior are influenced by Russian cultural values, beliefs, and attitudes (Vlachoutsicos, 2001). Therefore, understanding of Russian cultural values and ways they affect how education is perceived and delivered can contribute to the effectiveness of HRD practices (Shaw & Ormston, 2001).The purpose of this paper is to examine the literature on HRD in Russian enterprises, U.S. firms in Russia, or U.S.-Russian joint ventures to determine the role and function of HRD practitioners and researchers in creating a successful economic transition. The paper sought to answer one research question: What major topics related to HRD in Russian enterprises, U.S. firms in Russia, or U.S.-Russian joint ventures have been discussed in the
Business,Economics