Abstract:Acquiring high quality replacements for cows that leave the beef herd, or to build herd numbers, is essential to maintaining a high efficiency, high quality cow-calf enterprise. A key decision facing cow-calf producers is whether to raise or purchase replacement breeding stock (heifers or mature cows). Purchasing mature cows as replacements may be an option for some operations, however, the focus of this guide is strictly on heifers. Producers need to evaluate the replacement heifer raising decision separate from the rest of the cow-calf enterprise and identify its economic strengths and weaknesses. Raising replacements requires separate management, labor, facilities, feed, and other resources. Therefore, for the average producer the total cost of a raised replacement heifer can be quite high. Producers need to carefully weigh the advantages of home raised heifers (quality, etc.) against their costs. The attached cost-return budget format can assist producers in making more informed decisions. Budget Information The costs and returns in the budget are on a per-heifer produced basis. Costs are total economic costs and therefore include both explicit costs such as purchased feed, veterinary, utilities, etc., and implicit costs such as the opportunity cost of operator labor and owned feed resources. Returns are based on 83.5 percent of the heifers valued as springers ready to calve, 1.5 percent culled as open heifers at calving, 12.0 percent culled after the breeding season, and 2.0 percent culled as yearlings prior to breeding. Death loss is assumed to be 1 percent of the calves started in the replacement program. Production dates, feed requirements, and assumed values are shown in Table 1. Labor is assumed at 5 hours per heifer from weaning until 24 months of age (ready to calve). Other operating costs are included based on observed averages. Interest is charged on the average assumed facility and equipment investment for 16.5 months, and on half of the operating costs and the value of the heifer calf for 16.5 months. Depreciation on facilities and equipment is based on average investment with no salvage value at the end of its remaining life. Annualized facility and equipment cost (depreciation, insurance, and taxes) is multiplied by 1.375 because the budget covers a 16.5-month time period. Returns over total cost for the cow-calf producer can be interpreted as the total economic opportunity cost associated with raising one’s own replacement heifers rather than purchasing springer heifers at the assumed market price. The break-even price per heifer is the dollar value per head that would be required to cover all economic costs, or can be interpreted as the market value at which purchased heifers would be more “expensive” than raised replacements. Asset turnover and return on investment are based on total investment capital (both equity and borrowed). These measures have been converted to an annual basis to enable comparisons to other enterprises and other investment alternatives

6 Sow Farm Costs and Hurdles to Execution

Study on the Strategies of Pork Traceability System Constructing: Based on Cost-Benefit Analysis of Implementing Traceability System in Slaughtering and Processing Section

20 How do Producers and Nutritionists Determine Which Levers to Pull to Optimize Feed Cost and Profitability Under Differing Economic Conditions?

Managing prolific sows in tropical environments

Alternative farrowing accommodation: welfare and economic aspects of existing farrowing and lactation systems for pigs

Financial impact of average parity of culled females in a breed-to-wean swine operation using replacement gilt net present value analysis

Management Strategies Performed on the Newborn Piglet

Economic feasibility of interventions targeted at decreasing piglet perinatal and pre-weaning mortality across European countries

Impacts of Farrowing Pen Design, Season, and Sow Parity on Litter Performance and Piglet Mortality

217 Effect of Sow Feeder Design on Sow Body Weight, Litter Performance, and Feeder Cleaning Criteria

Estimation of cost efficiency of fattening pigs, sows, and piglets using SFA approach analysis: Evidence from China

A flexible tool for the assessment of the economic cost of pig disease in growers and finishers at farm level

151 Impact of Feed Allotment During the Wean-To-Estrus Interval on Sow Reproductive Performance

Modelling the economic efficiency of using different strategies to control Porcine Reproductive & Respiratory Syndrome at herd level

Contribution of semen trait selection, artificial insemination technique, and semen dose to the profitability of pig production systems: A simulation study

Factors for improving reproductive performance of sows and herd productivity in commercial breeding herds

170 Feeding the modern sow: Unlocking the value of dietary fiber

20 Trials and Tribulations of Countering Insufficient Sperm Quantity with Sperm Quality, Fertility, Synchrony and Deeper Site of Insemination

Control of pig reproduction in a breeding programme

33 Identification of How Future Climates May Impact the Reproductive Herd and What This May Mean for Nutrition

Kansas State University Agricultural Experiment Station and Cooperative Extension Service