Abstract:The WTO can play an important role in achieving the UN sustainable development goals. Investments in AI and IoT could go a long way, in that these technologies could lead to economic growth, innovation, good health, and new services. For this to happen, however, they must be adequately governed. This means, practically, that we need laws – and IP laws above all, given their role in incentivising creativity and innovation – that are fit for AI and IoT. As shown above, AI could lead to unprecedented research developments with revolutionary impact on healthcare. They would do so not only by changing the way we carry out research – with AI-powered data mining and cancer-predicting deep learning models – but also by making us rethink certain IP laws. The reference is to the patent system that has hitherto been abused by pharmaceutical companies that have developed strategies to retain perpetual and absolute monopolies on medical inventions, thus preventing access to medicines, especially in developing and least-developed countries. AI could change this. It could, indeed, change the standard currently applied to assess one of the key requirements for patentability, i.e. inventive step. We currently assess if an invention presupposes an inventive step and is hence patentable from the point of view of the ‘person skilled in the art’, a notional worker who lacks ingenuity and has limited knowledge. With AI becoming commonplace and increasingly creative, the new standard to be adopted may and should be the AI-enhanced researcher. Such a person would be more likely to consider new inventions as obvious and this would counter the over-protection of pharmaceutical inventions. Finally, the IoT is set to disrupt all the fields and all the laws that have been built on the good-product and hardware-software dichotomy. Patent laws are likely to be profoundly impacted – and may need a significant revision – because their exclusion from patentability of software may be factually circumvented by the ubiquitous presence of software in any mundane device and at any step of the supply chain. To conclude, IP laws are likely to play a limited role in governing AI and the IoT. It seems more probable that these technologies will ‘govern’ current IP laws in the sense of leading to new interpretation and policies that will make them more ‘sustainability-friendly’.

A Global Future Issues in Impact on Artificial Intelligence on Intellectual Property Law

Impact of Artificial Intelligence on Intellectual Property Rights

Intellectual Property in the Era of Artificial Intelligence: Challenges and Solutions

To: World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) Subject: IP Policy in relation to Artificial intelligence issues. Date: 13/02/2020 In response to the request for comments by World Intellectual Property Organization

IP Rights to AI-Generated Works: Barriers Presented by Existing Law and Reformations Needed

Artificial Intelligence and Intellectual Property: The Issues of the Legal Regulation of Patent Relations

Artificial Intelligence and Intellectual Property: An Economic Perspective

DEVELOPMENT OF AI AND ISSUES PERTAINING TO COPYRIGHT- A CRITICAL STUDY

Intellectual property and artificial intelligence: who is the author?

The Impact of Developments in Artificial Intelligence on Copyright and other Intellectual Property Laws

Artificial Intelligence and Intellectual Property: Navigating the Complexities of Cyber Law

The Global Impact of AI-Artificial Intelligence: Recent Advances and Future Directions, A Review

Intersection of generative artificial intelligence and copyright: an Indian perspective

ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE COPYRIGHT: PROBLEMS AND SOLUTIONS

The Implication of Generative Artificial Intelligence towards Intellectual Property Rights (Examining the Multifaceted Implications of Generative Artificial Intelligence on Intellectual Property Rights)

Can Artificial Intelligence and the Internet of Things be Governed to Achieve the UN Sustainable Development Goals? An Intellectual Property Law Perspective

Intellectual property issues in artificial intelligence: specific reference to the service sector

The Concept of ‘Inventiveness of Machines’: How Ready is Patent Law to Afford the Creative Inventiveness of Artificial Intelligence?

AI and IP: Theory to Policy and Back Again – Policy and Research Recommendations at the Intersection of Artificial Intelligence and Intellectual Property