DEVELOPMENT AND IMPLEMENTATION OF A PROGRAM OF PERSONALIZED APPROACH TO THE MANAGEMENT OF PATIENTS WITH CONSTITUTIONAL DELAY OF GROWTH AND PUBERTY
N.Yu. Filina,K.A. Cherednikova,N.V. Bolotova,A.P. Averyanov,V.K. Polyakov,,,,,
DOI: https://doi.org/10.24110/0031-403x-2021-100-6-121-132
2021-12-13
Abstract:Objective of the study: development and implementation of a program of personalized approach to the tactics of managing patients with constitutional delay of growth and puberty (CDGP). Materials and methods of research: a prospective, single-center, randomized study. The article presents the results of a comprehensive examination of 100 adolescent boys, of which the main group (n=70) – boys with CDGP at the age of 14–14.5 years and the comparison group (n=30) – healthy boys of 14–15 years. Clinical (SDS growth, SDS body mass index, orchiometry), laboratory (insulin-like growth factor 1, testosterone, luteinizing hormone, follicle-stimulating hormone, inhibin B, anti-Müllerian hormone, kisspeptin, thyroid stimulating hormone, thyroxin, prolactin), instrumental indicators (bone age, bioimpedansometry), indicators of psychological status (assessment of the quality of life, anxiety level, aggression level, depression level). Statistical processing: Statistica (Version 7 – Index, Stat. Soft Inc., USA) and Microsoft Exel, 2010. The following criteria were used: Mann–Whitney tests, Fisher's exact test, correlation analysis – Spearman® coefficient. In order to develop the algorithm, factor analysis is applied. Results: it was shown that patients with CDGP had a marked lag behind healthy peers in terms of clinical, metabolic and neuroendocrine indicators of physical and sexual development. With the help of factor analysis of the data obtained, a program of a personalized approach to the tactics of managing patients with CDGP has been developed. Various clinical applications of the program are presented. The sensitivity of the proposed method was 74.63%, 95% CI [62.51; 84.47%]; specificity of the method – 93%, 95% CI [77.93; 99.18%]; the accuracy of the diagnostic method – 80.4%, 95% CI [71.11; 87.78%].