Abstract:Our paper is concerned with the linguistic work of two Russian antiquarians, Vasily Kirillovich Tredyakovsky (1703–1769) and Alexander Petrovich Sumarokov (1717–1777). Both of them are renowned mostly as poets, but their antiquarian skills are much less known. For a long time their etymologies were regarded as a historical curiosity and it was only recently that there appeared a noticeable shift towards a more favourable opinion. But while dealing with history of linguistics, we should ignore correctness / falseness or plausibility / implausibility of etymologies and lay the emphasis on the task and purpose of an author. Etymological studies have always been a handy instrument for detecting the origins of peoples. The 18th century Europe witnessed an extraordinary rise of celtomania. Scholars tried to find Celtic roots of their nations, striving to emphasize their significance and priority, which was understood as antiquity or, one might say, indigenity. Tredyakovsky set himself a similar task in his “Three treatises on three main Russian antiquities” (1758). He starts with comparing Slavic and Germanic languages aiming to prove that Slavic is more ancient than Germanic and, accordingly, the Slavs are superior to the Germans. Taking into account the fact that the author did not distinguish between Slavic and Russian, it is obvious that in the end he sees his task in glorifying the Russian nation. Tredyakovsky’s treatise, for all its intents and purposes, is a rebuttal of German scholars who have claimed the superiority of Teutonic languages over Slavic. Tredyakovsky resorts to the best possible argument that was in store of contemporary linguistic science and appeals to Celtic language which was perceived as the last instance due to a celtomaniac wave that flooded all over Europe. For this purpose he first derives Slavic from Scythian, or rather identifies the Scythians with the Slavs, and then claims the antiquity of Scythian. Now, it turns out that the Slavonic language in fact is identical not only to Scythian, but also to Celtic, in a sense that Celts had spoken Slavonic before they formed a separate tribe and spread all over Europe where due to the natural language corruption they lost their original dialect and fell away from their roots. By means of such argument the Slavonic language at once takes the upper hand over Teutonic. In fact, Tredyakovsky tries to implant the European celtomania in the Russian ground, but substitutes the Slavs for the Celts, thereby changing celtomania into slavomania. In my opinion, Tredyakovsky’s etymologies should be considered against the background of this purely pragmatic task; in this case they cannot be regarded as ridiculous or curious. They should be taken as historical facts determined by extralinguistic causes. Certainly, Tredyakovsky’s use of linguistic arguments has often been ad hoc. Once Slavic was proclaimed as the most ancient language, it was necessary to show that the material of all other languages may be deduced and explained on the ground of Slavic. Naturally, the most valuable way of proving this was to derive from Russian ancient and modern ethnonyms as well as place names. In this manner a number of etymologies were produced, such as Etruscans – “hitroushki” (i. e. “sly ones”); Celts – “zhelty” (i.e. “yellow ones”) “after their fair hair”; Iberians – “oupery”, because they are locked (“ouperty”) from all sides by seas. Sumarokov published a treatise “On the origin of Russian people” which for the most part follows Tredyakovsky’s wake. Pragmatically considered, their work presents us with an interesting paradox: on the Russian ground the Western celtomania turns into slavomania. On the one hand, there is a noticeable and passionate desire to introduce the Russians into the European family of nations and, furthermore, to bring the Russian science up to the Western European standards. Making Slavs and Celts related, both scholars expanded the boundaries of Europe, presenting Russia as its natural part. From this point of view, they acted as predecessors of the 19th century “Westerners” in Russia. On the other hand, their method of etymologizing and the persistence with which they derived all the words of all languages from Russian, closely resembles the way of thinking which the 19th century slavophils adhered to.

FOREIGN NARRATIVE SOURCES ABOUT THE EPOCH OF ALEXANDER NEVSKY IN THE WORKS OF RUSSIAN HISTORIANS OF THE 18TH – FIRST QUARTER OF THE 19TH CENTURY

Non-Russian Mythology and Folklore in the Volga Travelogue of the 19th Century

History of Russian translations of fiction in 1800–1825

Publishing and literature sale in Russian and foreign languages as a means of modernization of Russia in the first quarter of the 18th century

NEW BOOKS ON THE RUSSIAN ABROAD OF THE 20TH CENTURY. THE NORTH CAUCASIAN DIASPORA IN EUROPE

A Report on Working in the Arkhiv Vneshnei Politiki Rossii

Sources and studies on the historical geography of ancient and medieval settlements in the Syr Darya, Talas, and Semirechye areas

Bibliophilism of the Nobility as an Element of the Cultural Environment of the Central Chernozem Region in the First Half of the 19th Century

World-Famous Russian Bibliographer (on the 170th Anniversary of N.M. Lisovsky)

The Wars of Svyatoslav: Time and Memory

A Foreign Artist and a Russian War: Peter von Hess, a Case Study in Imperial Patronage and National Identity

The history of recording the fragment of the Udmurt epic narrative “The Kalmez Knights”

The Construction of the Church of Alexander Nevsky in the City of Petrozavodsk in the 19th Сentury as an Example of Converting Old Believers into Christianity

The Topical Past: Instrumentalization of the Historical Memory of 1812 during the Crimean War of 1853–1856

Russian-Swedish Diplomatic Communication in the Petrine Era: The Chronicle of Language Choice

About the evolution of views on the character of the natives of the Tobol North in the 19th – early 20th centuries

Historiosophical Sources and Meanings of the Russian Philosophy of History

Late Qing Reforms of the Early 20th Century through the Eyes of Russian Diplomatic Representatives (based on the Documents from the Russian State Historical Archive)

Sacred New Building: Alexander Nevsky Cathedral in Reval and the Spread of Orthodoxy in the Governorate of Estonia at the End of the 19th — Beginning of the 20th Century

Military Oriental Studies in Russia and Europe: a Book-study Discourse

Славяномания и кельтомания в российской лингвистике XVIII века (Slavomania and Celtomania in the 18th Century Russian Linguistics)