Hybrid Percutaneous Management of Acute Midsubstance Achilles Tendon Ruptures
Christopher J. McMellen,Bijal Desai,Margaret A. Sinkler,Shana Miskovsky
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/26350254231152660
2023-03-01
Video Journal of Sports Medicine
Abstract:Background: Operative management techniques of Achilles tendon ruptures can be categorized into open repair, mini-open repair, or percutaneous repair. Indications: Surgical repair of acute ruptures of the Achilles tendon is indicated in athletic populations, with percutaneous repair being an effective technique with more favorable outcomes. Technique: With the patient prone, the Achilles rupture is identified and the Percutaneous Achilles Repair System (PARS) jig is inserted under the proximal paratenon. A series of Keith needles and flat braided SutureTape sutures are passed transversely across the proximal stump of the tendon. The sutures are then shuttled through the distal stump using a SutureLasso through medial and lateral percutaneous incisions on the distal medial and distal lateral borders of Achilles, respectively. Sutures are passed, tensioned, and secured to the posterior tuberosity of the calcaneus with two SwiveLock anchors. Results: Percutaneous repair, compared with open repair, results in lower wound complication rates, improved cosmetic appearance and fewer adhesions. Following surgery, patients follow a 5-stage rehabilitation protocol with return to sport when patients demonstrate dynamic neuromuscular control during multiplane activities without pain or swelling. Outcome studies have compared percutaneous repairs to open repairs, with percutaneous repairs demonstrating a quicker return to work or baseline activities (2.8 months versus 5.6 months) and a shorter return to play for athletes (average 18 weeks). Also, a greater number of PARS patients were able to return to baseline activities within 5 months (98%), compared with open repair patients (82%; P = .0001). In a prospective randomized controlled trial of 33 patients, Lim et al reported no postoperative wound infections in the percutaneous group and a 21% infection rate in the open repair group ( P = .01). Finally, in a recent systematic review of only percutaneous repairs, reported rates of sural nerve injury and rerupture were only 3.3% and 2.1%, respectively. Discussion/Conclusion: Compared to open repair, percutaneous Achilles repair allows for decreased risk of soft-tissue complications with comparable functional outcomes and earlier return to activity. Patient Consent Disclosure Statement: The author(s) attests that consent has been obtained from any patient(s) appearing in this publication. If the individual may be identifiable, the author(s) has included a statement of release or other written form of approval from the patient(s) with this submission for publication.