Abstract:Does a state’s access to the international economy affect its strategy to prevail in war? This question bears on some of the most important international challenges facing the United States. North Korea maintains a national ideology of self-sufficiency and does its best to isolate itself from the world. China fears the U.S. Navy could block the Strait of Malacca and disrupt its supply of oil. Some U.S. strategists see such a plan as an alternative to an “AirSea Battle.”Japan fears China could use its reclaimed islands in the South China Sea similarly. The United States has justified tariffs on steel and aluminum on national security grounds. Surprisingly, the traditional scholarly answer is no: industrial economies are sufficiently robust and economic isolation is sufficiently difficult that states facing economic isolation can easily adapt except in extraordinary circumstances. This paper challenges that claim. While economic isolation alone may not lead directly to defeat, it places or removes important constraints on a power’s strategic decision making. Economically isolated powers pursue riskier strategies, often launching attacks that expand the conflict. These broader conflicts often end in defeat. When powers have access to outside economic support, they have more strategic options, easing the challenges their armies face. This effect holds regardless of a state’s pre-war level of economic integration. This article reviews the principal arguments about pre-war economic integration and security and economic isolation in war. It then develops of theory of how economic isolation induces risky decision making. It briefly discusses case selection before exploring three critical cases in which great powers underwent different combinations of pre-war economic integration and war-time economic access: Germany in the First World War; Germany in the Second World War; and Russia in the Second World War. It concludes with a discussion of the implications of its analysis.

Oiling the War Machine? The Fuel Dilemma and Warfighting Capability

Dilemma and Strategies for Production of Diesel-Like Hydrocarbons by Deoxygenation of Biomass-Derived Fatty Acids

Oiling the Wheels of Foreign Policy?

Tactical Risk Assessment Method for Resilient Fuel Supply Chains for a Military Peacekeeping Operation

Evolving efficiency and robustness of the international oil trade network

Robust Design and Operations of Hydrocarbon Biofuel Supply Chain Integrating with Existing Petroleum Refineries Considering Unit Cost Objective

An Optimal-Pressure Control Strategy for Hydrostatic Wheel Loader.

Low-carbon warfare: climate change, net zero and military operations

Adaptive Equivalent Consumption Minimization Strategy for Off-Road Hydraulic Hybrid Vehicles: A Cycle-to-Cycle Optimization Approach.

Optimization Of Armored Equipment Operational Avail-Ability And Spare Support Footprint

Differential game model and its solution for the firepower-assignment in vessel formations in information war

How to Reduce Oil Consumption and Achieve Low-Carbon Goal for the Armed Forces

An analysis of the combustion characters and the mechanism of oil-consumption economy for diesel engines using water-blended oil

Strategic Benefit's Effect on Petroleum Competition Between China and Japan

Desperate Measures: The Effects of Economic Isolation on Warring Powers

Modeling and Optimization for Space Logistics: Review of State of the Art

Vessel Formations Firepower-assignment Model Based on Differential Game and Solving Analysis in Information War

Optimizing fire allocation in a Network Centric Warfare-type model

Security or Cost: A Study on the Optimization of China's Crude Oil Import Portfolio Based on “Data-Driven-scenario” Analysis

Analysis of Oil Issues in China from the Perspective of the Social and Strategic Significance of Oil Resources for the Nation

An interpretable machine-learned model for international oil trade network