Editorial: Social physics and the dynamics of second language acquisition
ZhaoHong Han,Paul J. Wiita
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fphy.2024.1392590
IF: 3.718
2024-03-05
Frontiers in Physics
Abstract:Social Physics and the Dynamics of Second Language Acquisition The present topic collection defies the general perception and operationalizes the assumption that physics and mathematics have much to contribute to our understanding of L2 development. In particular, they can be enlightening about some of the recalcitrant issues associated with (adult) human learning of non-primary languages. This collection features four papers, a synopsis of which follows.Addressing the notion of a critical period in language development and a chronic debate surrounding it in L2 research, in their original research article Han and Bao extend an interdisciplinary theory, Energy Conservation Theory for L2 Acquisition (ECT-L2A), to a widely observed attainment gap between child and adult L2 learners. Invoking the physics laws of energy conservation, angular momentum and gravity, ECT-L2A draws analogies between physical energies and L2 learning energies -kinetic energy for motivation, potential energy for the influence of the target language, and centrifugal energy for the deviation between the learner's first language and target language, and theorizes the dynamics of L2 attainment. ECT-L2A not only theoretically and geometrically confirms the existence of a critical period, but also mathematically identifies three learning periods: critical, post-critical, and adult. The authors close with three sets of questions corresponding to the three learning periods, inviting empirical investigations.In another original research article, Kim reports on a partial validation of ECT-L2A, focusing on the dynamic role of kinetic energy, that is, L2 motivation and aptitude, vis-à-vis L2 attainment. The study measures motivation and aptitude as well as grammatical ability in 203 adult Spanishspeaking learners of L2 English, statistically analyzing their relationships. Among the findings, (a) aptitude holds a positive correlation with attainment; (b) motivation decreases with advancing attainment; and (c) a combination of aptitude and motivation against grammatical ability yields a non-linear trajectory, as predicted by ECT-L2A. Therefore, the study partly confirms ECT-L2A's depiction of the changing role of L2 "kinetic energy," and, simultaneously, debunks the mainstream understanding of motivation as playing a static role in, or having an isomorphic relationship with, L2 attainment.Studying language use as a complex system, Tilsen's original research article seeks to pin down linguistic behavior as a non-equilibrium, open system. In order to overcome the challenges of defining the system and its components, Tilsen conducts a longitudinal experiment. He creates an 'insulated' system free from external influences and observes the interaction among the system components within. The closed system comprises an ad-hoc social network with 8 participants playing 535 dyadic map-navigation games for 10 weeks. The analysis of the data reveals orderly states, "an exponential decay-like pattern" over time amid seemingly disordered linguistic behaviors. Participants' linguistic behavior changes as a result of the aggregated effects of communicative interactions and it percolates through the social network. The study exemplifies a methodological approach to studying a putatively open, non-equilibrium system, which leads to useful inferences about language change.Finally, in a brief research report, Van Geert presents a dynamic systems model of L2 learning. The building of this model begins with a number of fundamental assumptions. The overarching assumption is that a learner's proficiency changes at any moment in time, manifested as a (re)distribution of potentialities, incurred by the learner's changing circumstances of using the L2. Another major assumption is that the learning process is normative in that the learner seeks to conform to the L2 speaking community (through interactions with native speakers of the L2). Accordingly, the model operates on two dynamic components: the L2 learner (i.e., represented by their changing proficiency) and the learning environment (e.g., the learner's social interlocutors). Focusing on system rather than agent dynamics, the model uses ratio scales and treats the two components categorically, with a view to uncovering systematic, intra-individual variations, and in turn, inter-learner variations.The four studies, theoretically and empirically, demonstrate the plausibility as well as the feasibility of applying a physics lens to studying language development phenomena. But most importantly, they showcase the viability of adapting a fundamental physics method to studying language development. The method begins by creating or assuming a closed system (i.e., a welldefined system) and traces its dynamic process over time within individual learners and, by extension, between learners. Crucially, such a system encompasses a three-dimensional interacti -Abstract Truncated-
physics, multidisciplinary