A comparative investigation of building rooftop retrofit actions using an energy and computer fluid dynamics approach
Angeliki Kitsopoulou,Dimitris Pallantzas,Christos Sammoutos,Panagiotis Lykas,Evangelos Bellos,Michail Gr. Vrachopoulos,Christos Tzivanidis
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2024.114326
IF: 7.201
2024-05-24
Energy and Buildings
Abstract:The present study studies the coupling method of building energy simulation and computational fluid dynamics analysis for the detailed and thorough investigation of roof retrofit techniques. The computations are conducted in DesignBuilder software and concern a one-story residential building, equipped with air-to-air heat pump split units, located in Athens, Greece. The retrofit actions aim at the improvement of the building rooftop thermal and optical properties and include i) the addition of external thermal insulation, ii) the addition of phase change material on the exterior surface, iii) the application of cool coating, and iv) the application of thermochromic coating. The aforementioned techniques are examined as standalone retrofit actions. The yearly heat pump electricity consumption and the local and mean surface thermal comfort indexes of predicted mean vote and predicted percentage of dissatisfied, for a typical winter and summer afternoon hour, are calculated and compared. The importance of the present study lies in the combination of energy simulation and thermal comfort analysis for the multi-criteria assessment and selection of the most suitable roof retrofit technique. Additionally, the evaluation of the indoor thermal environment with the integration of various passive roof retrofit techniques is not adequately investigated in the existing literature. The application of cool roof coating results in the maximum electricity savings for cooling (50.6%), whereas the addition of thermal insulation in the maximum decrease in electricity consumption for heating (21.9%) and total (18.4%). Furthermore, the application of thermochromic roof coating restricts the heating penalty at 6.3% in contrast to the cool coating (42.0%) but increases the predicted percentage of dissatisfied by 170% compared to the baseline scenario, during the examined afternoon winter hour. Lastly, every examined retrofit technique results in a comparable improvement in thermal comfort conditions for summer, undermining the energy advantages of the cool and thermochromic roof coatings, against the energy and thermal comfort effectiveness of the retrofit action of insulation.
energy & fuels,construction & building technology,engineering, civil