Abstract:Digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) is an advanced imaging application for breast cancer detection, which makes use of a number of 2D X-ray projection images over a limited angular range to reconstruct quasi 3D reconstruction images. As such, first an introduction to digital X-ray tomosynthesis is given, after which existing limited angle tomosynthesis methods are presented. In the next section DBT geometry and its development to date is discussed. Details are given on geometries currently available from different manufacturers, and recent advances. Part of this section presents the available relevant reconstruction methods. Next, we look into the DBT detectors and their performance evaluation. Current DBT detectors are based on amorphous silicon (a-Si) and amorphous selenium (a-Se) thin film transistor (TFT) technology. However, complementary metal-oxide-semiconductor (CMOS) active pixel sensor (APS) digital X-ray detectors have the potential to replace a-Si:H TFT detectors in DBT in the near future, due to a smaller pixel pitch, low electronic noise, faster frame rate and negligible image lag. The performance of current DBT detectors is evaluated mainly by: automatic exposure control performance, response function, noise analysis, detector element failure, and system projection modulation transfer function (MTF). Following this we discuss image quality measurements, because they are essential for the evaluation and optimization of DBT systems. They should represent relevant clinical tasks, such as the detection of microcalcifications and masses in mammographic backgrounds. Currently the CDMAM phantom is used for contrast-detail analysis (i.e., the required threshold contrast to detect discs of various diameters) of the reconstructed images. The TOR MAM phantom can also be used to score the visualization of discs, filaments and specks for various contrast levels. The parameter Z-resolution is used to assess the inter-plane spread of reconstruction artifacts associated with 1 mm diameter aluminum spheres (contained in a specific three-dimensional phantom). Furthermore, the system MTF in the x–y plane is used to take into account all sources of blurring in the DBT system: detector MTF, additional sources of unsharpness and the reconstruction algorithm. The final part of the chapter describes image simulation methods for DBT optimization. Briefly, DBT is currently under consideration for its use in breast cancer screening in Europe, in combination with 2D mammography or alone. Several parameters (such as image acquisition parameters, detector response, system geometry, radiation dose, and image processing and reconstruction algorithms) are studied for their effect on image quality and the investigation of the optimum use of DBT. Traditionally, large clinical trials are required to evaluate these parameters over a large number of women. Such trials are time consuming, expensive and require irradiating asymptomatic women. Alternatively, several research groups use virtual clinical trials (based on image simulation methods) to optimize DBT parameters in fast, radiation-free, and cost-effective ways. This part of the chapter reviews several simulation methods in DBT and the applications in evaluating its effectiveness.

Diagnostic Value of Digital Breast Tomosynthesis and Synthetic Images in Patients with Breast Cancer

The Differential Diagnostic Value of Digital Breast Tomosynthesis in Combination with Synthesized Two-Dimensional Images in Breast Disease

Comparison of the Diagnostic Performance of Synthesized Two-Dimensional Mammography and Full-Field Digital Mammography Alone or in Combination with Digital Breast Tomosynthesis.

Diagnostic accuracy of digital breast tomosynthesis versus digital mammography for benign and malignant lesions in breasts: a meta-analysis

Can Radiologists Replace Digital 2D Mammography with Synthetic 2D Mammography in Breast Cancer Screening and Diagnosis, or Are Both Still Needed?

Comparative Evaluation of Contrast-Enhanced Spectral Mammography and Digital Breast Tomosynthesis for Diagnosing and Treating Breast Cancer

Digital breast tomosynthesis(DBT) vs 2D mammography and impact of combined use: A meta-analysis

Digital Breast Tomosynthesis: Systems, Characterization and Simulation

Abbreviated breast MRI or digital breast tomosynthesis for breast cancer detection in dense breasts? A retrospective preliminary study with comparable results

Diagnostic performance of tomosynthesis plus synthetic mammography versus full‐field digital mammography with or without tomosynthesis in breast cancer screening: A systematic review and meta‐analysis

Digital Breast Tomosynthesis in Diagnosis of Dense Breast Lesions

Virtual clinical trial to compare cancer detection using combinations of 2D mammography, digital breast tomosynthesis and synthetic 2D imaging

Comparative analysis of cone‐beam breast computed tomography and digital breast tomosynthesis for breast cancer diagnosis: A comprehensive study on reconstruction algorithms

Synthetic 2D Mammography Versus Standard 2D Digital Mammography: A Diagnostic Test Accuracy Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Value of automated breast ultrasound in screening: Standalone and as a supplemental to digital breast tomosynthesis

Performance of Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Versus Digital Mammography in Women With a Family History of Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review

Digital Breast Tomosynthesis for Upgraded BIRADS Scoring towards the True Pathology of Lesions Detected by Contrast-Enhanced Mammography

Comparison of Diagnostic Test Accuracy of Cone-Beam Breast Computed Tomography and Digital Breast Tomosynthesis for Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Approach

Breast Cancers Detected during a Decade of Screening with Digital Breast Tomosynthesis: Comparison with Digital Mammography

Applications of Advanced Breast Imaging Modalities

Assessing Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Impact on Early Cancer Detection: Insights from Consecutive Screening