Abstract:The Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm (QAOA) is an extensively studied variational quantum algorithm utilized for solving optimization problems on near-term quantum devices. A significant focus is placed on determining the effectiveness of training the $n$-qubit QAOA circuit, i.e., whether the optimization error can converge to a constant level as the number of optimization iterations scales polynomially with the number of qubits. In realistic scenarios, the landscape of the corresponding QAOA objective function is generally non-convex and contains numerous local optima. In this work, motivated by the favorable performance of Bayesian optimization in handling non-convex functions, we theoretically investigate the trainability of the QAOA circuit through the lens of the Bayesian approach. This lens considers the corresponding QAOA objective function as a sample drawn from a specific Gaussian process. Specifically, we focus on two scenarios: the noiseless QAOA circuit and the noisy QAOA circuit subjected to local Pauli channels. Our first result demonstrates that the noiseless QAOA circuit with a depth of $\tilde{\mathcal{O}}\left(\sqrt{\log n}\right)$ can be trained efficiently, based on the widely accepted assumption that either the left or right slice of each block in the circuit forms a local 1-design. Furthermore, we show that if each quantum gate is affected by a $q$-strength local Pauli channel with the noise strength range of $1/{\rm poly} (n)$ to 0.1, the noisy QAOA circuit with a depth of $\mathcal{O}\left(\log n/\log(1/q)\right)$ can also be trained efficiently. Our results offer valuable insights into the theoretical performance of quantum optimization algorithms in the noisy intermediate-scale quantum era.

Principal Component Analysis and t-Distributed Stochastic Neighbor Embedding Analysis in the Study of Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm Entangled and Non-Entangled Mixing Operators

PCA and t-SNE analysis in the study of QAOA entangled and non-entangled mixing operators

How Much Entanglement Do Quantum Optimization Algorithms Require?

Entanglement perspective on the quantum approximate optimization algorithm

Parameter optimization comparison in QAOA using Stochastic Hill Climbing with Random Re-starts and Local Search with entangled and non-entangled mixing operators

Analytical Expressions for the Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm and its Variants

Similarity-Based Parameter Transferability in the Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm

Information scrambling and entanglement in quantum approximate optimization algorithm circuits

Trainability Analysis of Quantum Optimization Algorithms from a Bayesian Lens

The Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm performance with low entanglement and high circuit depth

Graph Representation Learning for Parameter Transferability in Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm

Transferability of optimal QAOA parameters between random graphs

Missing Puzzle Pieces in the Performance Landscape of the Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm

Linearly simplified QAOA parameters and transferability

Evaluating Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm: A Case Study

Resource-efficient quantum principal component analysis

Quantum approximate optimization via learning-based adaptive optimization

Quantifying the efficiency of state preparation via quantum variational eigensolvers

Parameter Generation of Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm with Diffusion Model