Abstract:ABSTRACT Axenic Aedes aegypti mosquitoes were colonized with bacteria from an environmental water source to compare the midgut microbiota acquired from the wild to the microbiome of insectary-reared mosquitoes, specifically over the course of blood meal digestion. 16S rRNA gene sequencing revealed that diversity, composition, and community turnover of the midgut microbiomes were distinct between the insectary and environmental groups, with the environmental microbiomes having a greater diversity and larger temporal shifts over the course of the blood meal. Metagenomic prediction from the 16S rRNA gene sequence data pointed to metabolic processes such as vitamin biosynthesis, fatty acid recycling, and fermentation pathways differentiating the functional potential of the two different microbiomes. To further test if we could identify functional traits that distinguished the two microbiomes, we performed a culture-based assay. Culturable bacteria were more abundant in the insectary microbiomes and there was very little overlap in the taxonomy of bacteria recovered from the insectary or environmental groups. The ability of the isolates to lyse blood cells was determined on blood agar plates, and only isolates from the environmental microbiome harbored the ability to perform hemolysis in culture. These data support that the differences in taxonomy observed between the two different microbiomes also result in differences in the functional potential of the community. Thus, this study demonstrates the power of the axenic mosquito model to shed light on the community ecology of the mosquito microbiome, and the potential to better represent the microbiomes of wild mosquitoes in a laboratory setting. IMPORTANCE The blood meal of the female mosquito serves as a nutrition source to support egg development, so is an important aspect of its biology. Yet, the roles the microbiome may play in blood digestion are poorly characterized. We employed axenic mosquitoes to investigate how the microbiome differs between mosquitoes reared in the insectary versus mosquitoes that acquire their microbiome from the environment. Environmental microbiomes were more diverse and showed larger temporal shifts over the course of blood digestion. Importantly, only bacteria from the environmental microbiome performed hemolysis in culture, pointing to functional differences between bacterial populations. These data highlight that taxonomic differences between the microbiomes of insectary-reared and wild mosquitoes are potentially also related to their functional ecology. Thus, axenic mosquitoes colonized with environmental bacteria offer a way to investigate the role of bacteria from the wild in mosquito processes such as blood digestion, under controlled laboratory conditions.

Introducing an environmental microbiome to axenic Aedes aegypti mosquitoes documents bacterial responses to a blood meal

Introducing an Environmental Microbiome to Axenic Insectary Reared Mosquitoes Alters Host and Microbe Blood Digestion Phenotypes

The Interplay Between Nutrition and the Dynamics of the Midgut Microbiome of the Mosquito Reveals Putative Symbionts

Blood meal source and mixed blood-feeding influence gut bacterial community composition in Aedes aegypti

Bacterial communities of Aedes aegypti mosquitoes differ between crop and midgut tissues

Mosquitoes reared in distinct insectaries within an institution in close spatial proximity possess significantly divergent microbiomes

Mosquitoes reared in distinct insectaries within an institution in close spatial proximity possess significantly divergent microbiome

Midgut bacterial dynamics in Aedes aegypti

Single-cell transcriptional landscapes of Aedes aegypti midgut and fat body after a bloodmeal

Multiple Factors Determine the Structure of Bacterial Communities Associated With Aedes albopictus Under Artificial Rearing Conditions

Characterization of the reproductive tract bacterial microbiota of virgin, mated, and blood-fed Aedes aegypti and Aedes albopictus females

Aedes aegypti gut transcriptomes respond differently to microbiome transplants from field‐caught or laboratory‐reared mosquitoes

Relative contributions of various endogenous and exogenous factors to the mosquito microbiota

Revisiting the paradigm of anhematophagy in male mosquitoes

Microbiota Variation Across Life Stages of European Field-Caught Anopheles atroparvus and During Laboratory Colonization: New Insights for Malaria Research

Select Gut Bacteria Promote Mosquito Larval Growth by Contributing Protease Activity and Optimal Ionic Microenvironment for Protein Digestion

A Transcriptomic Atlas of Aedes Aegypti Reveals Detailed Functional Organization of Major Body Parts and Gut Regional Specializations in Sugar-Fed and Blood-Fed Adult Females

Multi-Omic Analysis of Symbiotic Bacteria Associated With Aedes aegypti Breeding Sites

Analyzing gut microbiota composition in individual Anopheles mosquitoes after experimental treatment

Bidirectional Microbiome-Gut-Brain-Axis Communication Influences Metabolic Switch-Associated Responses in the Mosquito Anopheles culicifacies