Abstract:The events of World War II and its component – the German-Soviet War do not lose their significance more than 75 years after its end and remain a field for fraught scientific debate in the society. Historical lessons of the past tragedy must be studied from all angles and interpreted objectively. The European choice of Ukraine stimulates the national scientists not to ignore thorough military historical research of the specialists from near and far abroad, and results of this objective studies must be taken into consideration in the contemporary Ukrainian historical discourse. Characteristics and evaluations of the foreign colleagues are not only important in view of reconstruction of the historical events, but also from the scientific and cognitive perspectives of research of World War II, overcoming various myths and political prejudices. In retrospective evaluations, the information contained in the article concerns security of the contemporary Ukraine, as far as it demonstrates what political, military and propaganda tools can be implemented by an aggressor. The article reveals a wide range of problems: political and diplomatic maneuvers of the USSR and Germany on the eve of the war, strategic plans of the Workers and Peasants’ Red Army and the Wehrmacht, events on the German-Soviet front in June-December 1941, which are covered in foreign historiography, first of all, in the Anglo-American and German one. The authors of the publication rely on significant source material represented in foreign publications, unbiased analysis of facts and events and their original interpretation. The scientific basis for writing this article were the works by famous politicians W. Churchill, F. Roosevelt, M. Albright, etc. The authors of the article rely in their research on the representative legacy of the historians from far-abroad countries: B. Liddel Hart, A. Clark, W. Shirer, O. Werth, P. Carell, L. Deighton, B. Alexander, D. Glantz, G. Jacobsen, M. Hastings, T. Hunchak, S. Yekelchyk, which contains significant informative material. The publication considers important scientific investigations of the specialists from the neighboring countries: D. Volkonogov, V. Karpov, V. Anfilov, R. Irenarkhov, V. Deynis, Yu. Gorkov, O. Isaiev, V. Runov, V. Sherstnev, B. Shaptalov, etc. The mentioned authors have managed, to a large extent, to free the history of the war from Soviet stereotypes, to use the sources of the Archive of the Ministry of Defence of the Russian Federation, which were declassified only in the post-Soviet time. To form the authors’ vision, memoirs of the military and political elite of Reich III – J. Goebbels, H. Rauschning, F. Halder, W. Keitel, Е. Manstein, H. Guderian, H. Hoth, K. Tippelskirch, G. Blumentritt, etc. – were involved. The authors of the article arrived at the conclusion that the science of contemporary military-historical research in Ukraine clearly contrasts with the existing foreign narratives. Therefore, foreign experience and historical practices of the colleagues from near and far abroad enable to expand drastically the field for scientific discourse, to fill it with the meaningful material and from the point of pluralism of opinions, to give the right answers for the problematic issues.

The Significance of the Defense of Tsaritsyn in 1918. Economic and Military-strategic Aspects.

The Struggle for Tsaritsyn during the Civil War in Russia: On Publication of the Collective Monograph

Experience of Building Defensive Lines on the Northern Face of the Kursk Bulge in Summer–Fall 1943 as Reflected in Archival Documents

Military and Political Decisions of the Supreme Command of the USSR and Germany on the Eve of the Battle of Stalingrad (June – July 1942)

A NEW WORD IN THE SECURITY OF RUSSIAN REPUBLIC: THE QUESTION OF THE COSSACK ARMY ORGANIZATION IN AUGUST - SEPTEMBER, 1917

Food Contribution of the Rostov Region to the Great Victory

POLITICAL WORK IN THE SOUTHERN FRONT MILITARY FORCES THROUGHOUT THE RUSSIAN CIVIL WAR (1918-1920)

Political and Educational Work in the Rear Support Units on the Kursk Bulge

UK National Archives on the Significance of the Battle of Stalingrad: A Review of Sources and Research Prospects

June 22, 1941 in the historical files of foreign historiography

POLITICAL WORK TO ESTABLISH MILITARY DISCIPLINE IN THE TROOPS OF THE SOVIET EASTERN FRONT IN THE 1918-1919: SOME ASPECTS

“Nosovich and Kovalevsky Are Politically Unreliable People”: S.S. Ioffe’s Memoir About the Work of the Supreme Military Inspectorate in the South of Russia in 1918

Anti-war theme in the works of L. Tolstoy and L. Andreev.

The problems of studying, preserving and presenting the historical and cultural heritage of the Civil War epoch in Siberia on the example of the funds of the Shushenskoye Museum-Reserve

Rethinking War History: the Evolution of Representations of Stalin and His Policies During the Great Patriotic War of 1941–1945 in Soviet and Russian History Textbooks

Defense of Kyiv by the Army of the Ukrainian People's Republic against the military of Bolshevik Russia in January-February 1919

Regulation of trade and supply by the government of general Denikin during the Russian Civil War

Lessons of History: Appealing to the Experience of the Crimean War on the Pages of the Military Press during the Revolutionary Crisis of 1905–1907

Moscow Museums on the Eve and in the Initial Period of the Great Patriotic War: Organization, Structure, Evacuation

The Nationalization of Patriotism in Russian Literature during the Crimean War: Institutions, Everyday Nationalism, and Images of Peasants

“The Question of Reinforcing Colonization of the Amur Region Ended in a Single Attempt”: From the Note of the Qualified Representative of the Ministry of Agriculture N. K. Schuman (1916)