Abstract:CO2 mineral carbonation (MC) curing technology provides a promising solution for large-scale CO2 utilization and construction sectors towards low-carbon and environmentally friendly production of concrete, but studies on the total environmental impacts of this technology are scarce. Accordingly, this paper evaluated the life cycle environmental impacts of seven promising concrete blocks from CO2 MC curing manufacturing pathways (Ordinary-Portland cement block, MgO-Portland cement block, wollastonite-Portland cement block, limestone-Portland cement block, calcium silicate cement block, slag-Portland cement block and Waste Concrete Aggregate block), offering detailed results of cradle-togate life cycle assessment and inventory. Identification of the contributions of subdivided raw materials and manufacturing processes, as well as the energy consumption, transportation, and upstream processes for raw materials was performed. It was shown that 292-454 kg CO2-eq global warming potential (GWP) of 1 m(3) CO2-cured non-hollow concrete blocks were obtained. By contrast, results indicated the 419 kg CO2-eq GWP from a base case of conventional (steam-cured, non MC) Ordinary-Portland cement block. Up to 30% of CO2 emission avoidance could be achieved when replacing steam curing by MC curing and adjusting the binder types. From the point of view of materials and manufacturing, the reduced use of Portland cement is a key step for environmental optimization, while reducing the energy consumption for maintaining high-pressure carbonation helps to cut down the cumulative energy demand. Increasing the blending ratio in binary binders and the lightweight redesign also proved to be beneficial solutions for mitigating environmental impacts of CO2-cured concrete blocks. Wollastonite-Portland cement block and slag-Portland cement block using natural wollastonite and blast furnace slag in binary binders obtained the most favorably scores in all impact assessment indicators, and thus, are arguably considered as the most sustainable types of concrete blocks. (C) 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Lower carbon dioxide cements and concretes: bringing new materials into UK industrial use

Eco-efficient cements: Potential economically viable solutions for a low-CO2 cement-based materials industry

Advancements in low-carbon concrete as a construction material for the sustainable built environment

Cement and carbon emissions

Environmental impacts and decarbonization strategies in the cement and concrete industries

CO2 utilization for concrete production: Commercial deployment and pathways to net-zero emissions

Sustainable cement production—present and future

Reducing the Carbon Footprint of Concrete by Expanding the Use of Supplementary Cementitious Materials

An Overview on the Influence of Various Parameters on the Fabrication and Engineering Properties of CO2-cured Cement-Based Composites

Cement and Alternatives in the Anthropocene

Carbon dioxide reduction potential in the global cement industry by 2050

Low-Carbon Transition in the Cement Industry

Ways to reduce the impact of the construction industry on the environment and environmental measures

Modern sustainable cement and concrete composites: Review of current status, challenges and guidelines

Delivering Low Carbon Concrete for Network Rail on the Routemap to Net Zero

Recent Progress in Green Cement Technology Utilizing Low-Carbon Emission Fuels and Raw Materials: A Review

Life-cycle Assessment of Emerging CO2 Mineral Carbonation-Cured Concrete Blocks: Comparative Analysis of CO2 Reduction Potential and Optimization of Environmental Impacts

Is net-zero feasible: Systematic review of cement and concrete decarbonization technologies

Compressive strength and environmental impact of sustainable blended cement with high-dosage Limestone and Calcined Clay (LC2)

The road to low-carbon concrete

Calcium-Based Binders in Concrete or Soil Stabilization: Challenges, Problems, and Calcined Clay as Partial Replacement to Produce Low-Carbon Cement