Radiation biodosimetry: Current Status and Future Initiatives

Adayabalam S. Balajee,Helen C. Turner,Ruth C. Wilkins

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1159/000535488

2023-11-29

Cytogenetic and Genome Research

Abstract:None

cell biology,genetics & heredity

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

HEMODOSE: A Set of Multi-parameter Biodosimetry Tools

Shaowen Hu,W. Blakely,F. Cucinotta

2014-01-01

Abstract:University of Nevada, Las Vegas, NV 89154, USA There continues to be important concerns of the possibility of the occurrence of acute radiation syndromes following nuclear and radiological terrorism or accidents that may result in mass casualties in densely populated areas. To guide medical personnel in their clinical decisions for effective medical management and treatment of the exposed individuals, biological markers are usually applied to examine radiation induced biological changes to assess the severity of radiation injury to sensitive organ systems. Among these the peripheral blood cell counts are widely used to assess the extent of radiation induced bone marrow (BM) injury. This is due to the fact that hematopoietic system is a vulnerable part of the human body to radiation damage. Particularly, the lymphocyte, granulocyte, and platelet cells are the most radiosensitive of the blood elements, and monitoring their changes after exposure is regarded as a practical and recommended laboratory test to estimate radiation dose and injury. In this work we describe the HEMODOSE web tools, which are built upon solid physiological and pathophysiological understanding of mammalian hematopoietic systems, and rigorous coarse-grained bio-mathematical modeling and validation. Using single or serial granulocyte, lymphocyte, leukocyte, or platelet counts after exposure, these tools can estimate absorbed doses of adult victims very rapidly and accurately to assess the severity of BM radiation injury. Some patient data from historical accidents are utilized as examples to demonstrate the capabilities of these tools as a rapid point-of-care diagnostic or centralized high-throughput assay system in a large-scale radiological disaster scenario. HEMODOSE web tools establish robust correlations between the absorbed doses and victim's various types of blood cell counts not only in the early time window (1 or 2 days), but also in very late phase (up to 4 weeks) after exposure. Disclaimer. The opinions or assertions contained herein are the private views of the authors and are not necessarily those of the Armed Forces Radiobiology Research Institute, the Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, the University of Nevada, the U.S. Department of Defense, or National Aeronautics and Space Administration.
Biodosimetry: Medicine, Science, and Systems to Support the Medical Decision-Maker Following a Large Scale Nuclear or Radiation Incident.

John F. Koerner,C. N. Coleman

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/rpd/ncw155

2016-07-29

Radiation Protection Dosimetry

Abstract:The public health and medical response to a radiological or nuclear incident requires the capability to sort, assess, treat, triage and to ultimately discharge, refer or transport people to their next step in medical care. The size of the incident and scarcity of resources at the location of each medical decision point will determine how patients are triaged and treated. This will be a rapidly evolving situation impacting medical responders at regional, national and international levels. As capabilities, diagnostics and medical countermeasures improve, a dynamic system-based approach is needed to plan for and manage the incident, and to adapt effectively in real time. In that the concepts and terms can be unfamiliar and possibly confusing, resources and a concept of operations must be considered well in advance. An essential underlying tenet is that medical evaluation and care will be managed by healthcare professionals with biodosimetry assays providing critical supporting data.

Environmental Science,Engineering,Medicine
Multicentric evaluation of conventional dosimetry vs bio-dosimetry over a period of two years for a three-point contact

Balakrishnan Jayan,Manu Krishnan,Seema Saraswathy,Shilpi Gupta,Manisha Agarwal,Kavita Sahai

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mjafi.2021.03.008

Abstract:Background: Dental radiology represents the best model for evaluating the effects of low-dose ionizing radiation. Therefore, this study evaluated the awareness on radiation hygiene among dental ancillary personnel through a questionnaire and their absorbed doses by physical and biologic dosimetry. Methods: The multicentric study included two groups. Group I (N = 30) consisted of dental staff involved in dental radiology. An equal number of personnel who were not related to radiology formed the control group. Knowledge (K), attitude (A), and practice (P) of participants were assessed using a KAP questionnaire. Radiation exposure was evaluated by physical dosimetry at 3 time periods: at the beginning of the study (T1), after 10 months (T2), and at the end after 20 months (T3). Similarly, biologic dosimetry was also carried out at 3 time points by dicentric chromosome aberration assay. The data were compared using percentage analysis, analysis of variance (one-way analysis of variance), and Student's t- test. Results: The KAP survey demonstrated enhanced understanding of radiation protection measures and its sound practice by the participants. Physical dosimetry showed a significant increase in absorbed dose at 3 time points: T1, T2, and T3. However, no chromosomal aberrations were observed in blood lymphocytes for any of the participants in the optimized 4-day biodosimetry protocol. Conclusion: Good radiation protection protocols-safe distance from the radiation source and wear of lead aprons and thyroid collars-ensured low absorbed doses. The 4-day protocol is an important step toward developing biodosimetry laboratories in the Armed Forces Medical Services for clinical and national radiation countermeasure strategies.
In Vivo Mammary Tumourigenesis in the Sprague-Dawley Rat and Microdosimetric Correlates

JF Dicello,A Christian,FA Cucinotta,DS Gridley,R Kathirithamby,J Mann,AR Markham,MF Moyers,GR Novak,S Piantadosi,R Ricart-Arbona,DM Simonson,JD Strandberg,M Vazquez,JR Williams,Y Zhang,H Zhou,D Huso

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/0031-9155/49/16/024

IF: 3.5

2004-01-01

Physics in Medicine and Biology

Abstract:Standard methods for risk assessments resulting from human exposures to mixed radiation fields in Space consisting of different particle types and energies rely upon quality factors. These are generally defined as a function of linear energy transfer (LET) and are assumed to be proportional to the risk. In this approach, it is further assumed that the risks for single exposures from each of the radiation types add linearly. Although risks of cancer from acute exposures to photon radiations have been measured in humans, quality factors for protons and ions of heavier atomic mass are generally inferred from animal and/or cellular data. Because only a small amount of data exists for such particles, this group has been examining tumourigenesis initiated by energetic protons and iron ions. In this study, 741 female Sprague-Dawley rats were irradiated or sham irradiated at approximately 60 days of age with 250 MeV protons, 1 GeV/nucleon iron ions or both protons and iron ions. The results suggest that the risk of mammary tumours in the rats sequentially irradiated with 1 GeV/nucleon 56Fe ions and 250 MeV protons is less than additive. These data in conjunction with earlier results further suggest that risk assessments in terms of only mean LETs of the primary cosmic rays may be insufficient to accurately evaluate the relative risks of each type of particle in a radiation field of mixed radiation qualities.
Internal Dosimetry: State of the Art and Research Needed

Francois Paquet

DOI: https://doi.org/10.14407/jrpr.2021.00297

2022-12-30

Journal of Radiation Protection and Research

Abstract:Internal dosimetry is a discipline which brings together a set of knowledge, tools and procedures for calculating the dose received after incorporation of radionuclides into the body. Several steps are necessary to calculate the committed effective dose (CED) for workers or members of the public. Each step uses the best available knowledge in the field of radionuclide biokinetics, energy deposition in organs and tissues, the efficiency of radiation to cause a stochastic effect, or in the contributions of individual organs and tissues to overall detriment from radiation. In all these fields, knowledge is abundant and supported by many works initiated several decades ago. That makes the CED a very robust quantity, representing exposure for reference persons in reference situation of exposure and to be used for optimization and assessment of compliance with dose limits. However, the CED suffers from certain limitations, accepted by the International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP) for reasons of simplification. Some of its limitations deserve to be overcome and the ICRP is continuously working on this. Beyond the efforts to make the CED an even more reliable and precise tool, there is an increasing demand for personalized dosimetry, particularly in the medical field. To respond to this demand, currently available tools in dosimetry can be adjusted. However, this would require coupling these efforts with a better assessment of the individual risk, which would then have to consider the physiology of the persons concerned but also their lifestyle and medical history. Dosimetry and risk assessment are closely linked and can only be developed in parallel. This paper presents the state of the art of internal dosimetry knowledge and the limitations to be overcome both to make the CED more precise and to develop other dosimetric quantities, which would make it possible to better approximate the individual dose.
Rethinking Dosimetry: The Perils of Extrapolated External-Beam Radiotherapy Constraints to Radionuclide Therapy

Jonathan Strosberg,Michael S. Hofman,Taymeyah Al-Toubah,Thomas A. Hope

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.123.267167

2024-03-02

Journal of Nuclear Medicine

Abstract:Ongoing discussion within the nuclear medicine community suggests that all radionuclide therapies (RNTs) should include posttreatment quantitative dosimetry as part of standard clinical care. The hypothesis is that fixed administered activities limit the potential efficacy of RNT and increase the

radiology, nuclear medicine & medical imaging
Retrospective biodosimetry techniques: Focus on cytogenetics assays for individuals exposed to ionizing radiation

C Herate,L Sabatier

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mrrev.2019.108287

Abstract:In the absence of physical data, biodosimetry tools are required for fast dose and risk assessment in the event of radiological or nuclear mass accidents or attacks to triage exposed humans and take immediate medical countermeasures. Biodosimetry tools have mostly been developed for retrospective dose assessment and the follow-up of victims of irradiation. Among them, cytogenetics analyses, to reveal chromosome damage, are the most developed and allow the determination of doses from blood samples as low as 100 mGy. Various cytogenetic tests have already allowed retrospective dose assessment of Chernobyl liquidators and military personnel exposed to nuclear tests after decades. In this review, we discuss the properties of various biodosimetry techniques, such as their sensitivity and limitations as a function of the time from exposure, using multiple examples of nuclear catastrophes or working exposure. Among them, chromosome FISH hybridization, which reveals chromosome translocations, is the most reliable due to the persistence of translocations for decades, whereas dicentric chromosome and micronuclei assays allow rapid and accurate dose assessment a short time after exposure. Both need to be adjusted through mathematical algorithms for retrospective analyses, accounting for the time since exposure and the victims' age. The goal for the future will be to better model chromosome damage, reduce the time to result, and develop new complementary biodosimetry approaches, such as mutation signatures.
A Multiple Parameters Biodosimetry Tool with Various Blood Cell Counts - the Hemodose Approach

Shaowen Hu

2014-01-01

Abstract:There continue to be important concerns about the possibility of the occurrence of acute radiation syndromes following nuclear and radiological terrorism or accidents that may result in mass casualties in densely populated areas. To guide medical personnel in their clinical decisions for effective medical management and treatment of the exposed individuals, biological markers are usually applied to examine radiation induced biological changes to assess the severity of radiation injury to sensitive organ systems. Among these the peripheral blood cell counts are widely used to assess the extent of radiation induced bone marrow injury. This is due to the fact that the hematopoietic system is the most vulnerable part of the human body to radiation damage. Particularly, the lymphocyte, granulocyte, and platelet cells are the most radiosensitive of the blood elements, and monitoring their changes after exposure is regarded as a practical and recommended laboratory test to estimate radiation dose and injury. Based upon years of physiological and pathophysiological investigation of mammalian hematopoietic systems, and rigorous coarse-grained bio-mathematical modeling and validation on species from mouse, to dog, monkey, and human, we have developed a set of software tools Hemodose, which can use single or serial granulocyte, lymphocyte, leukocyte, or platelet counts after exposure to estimate absorbed doses of adult victims very rapidly and accurately. Some patient data from historical accidents are utilized as examples to demonstrate the capabilities of these tools as a rapid point-of-care diagnostic or centralized high-throughput assay system in a large-scale radiological disaster scenario. Most significant to the improvement of national and local preparedness of a potential nuclear/radiological disaster, this HemoDose approach establishes robust correlations between the absorbed doses and victim's various types of blood cell counts not only in the early time window (1 or 2 days), but also in the very late phase (up to 4 weeks) after exposure.
The NIAID/RNCP Biodosimetry Program: An Overview

Merriline M Satyamitra,David R Cassatt,Olivia Molinar-Inglis,Carmen I Rios,Lanyn P Taliaferro,Thomas A Winters,Andrea L DiCarlo

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1159/000534213

Abstract:Established in 2004, the Radiation and Nuclear Countermeasures Program (RNCP), within the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID), National Institutes of Health has the central mission to advance medical countermeasure mitigators/therapeutics, and biomarkers and technologies to assess, triage, and inform medical management of patients experiencing acute radiation syndrome and/or the delayed effects of acute radiation exposure. The RNCP biodosimetry mission space encompasses: (1) basic research to elucidate novel approaches for rapid and accurate assessment of radiation exposure, (2) studies to support advanced development for US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) clearance of promising triage or treatment devices/approaches, (3) characterization of biomarkers and/or assays to determine degree of tissue or organ dose that can predict outcome of radiation injuries (i.e., organ failure, morbidity, and/or mortality), and (4) outreach efforts to facilitate interactions with researchers developing cutting edge biodosimetry approaches. Thus far, no biodosimetry device has been FDA cleared for use during a radiological/nuclear incident. At NIAID, advancement of radiation biomarkers and biodosimetry approaches is facilitated by a variety of funding mechanisms (grants, contracts, cooperative and interagency agreements, and Small Business Innovation Research awards), with the objective of advancing devices and assays toward clearance, as outlined in the FDA's Radiation Biodosimetry Medical Countermeasure Devices Guidance. The ultimate goal of the RNCP biodosimetry program is to develop and establish accurate and reliable biodosimetry tools that will improve radiation preparedness and ultimately save lives during a radiological or nuclear incident.
Cytogenetic follow-up studies on humans with internal and external exposure to ionizing radiation

Adayabalam S Balajee,Gordon K Livingston,Maria B Escalona,Terri L Ryan,Ronald E Goans,Carol J Iddins

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6498/ac125a

2021-11-15

Abstract:Cells exposed to ionizing radiation have a wide spectrum of DNA lesions that include DNA single-strand breaks, DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs), oxidative base damage and DNA-protein crosslinks. Among them, DSB is the most critical lesion, which when mis-repaired leads to unstable and stable chromosome aberrations. Currently, chromosome aberration analysis is the preferred method for biological monitoring of radiation-exposed humans. Stable chromosome aberrations, such as inversions and balanced translocations, persist in the peripheral blood lymphocytes of radiation-exposed humans for several years and, therefore, are potentially useful tools to prognosticate the health risks of radiation exposure, particularly in the hematopoietic system. In this review, we summarize the cytogenetic follow-up studies performed by REAC/TS (Radiation Emergency Assistance Center/Training site, Oak Ridge, USA) on humans exposed to internal and external radiation. In the light of our observations as well as the data existing in the literature, this review attempts to highlight the importance of follow-up studies for predicting the extent of genomic instability and its impact on delayed health risks in radiation-exposed victims.
Impact of Partial Body Shielding from Very High Dose Rates on Untargeted Metabolomics in Biodosimetry

Evan L. Pannkuk,Evagelia C. Laiakis,Guy Garty,Sunil Bansal,Meth M. Jayatilake,Yuewen Tan,Brian Ponnaiya,Xuefeng Wu,Sally A. Amundson,David J. Brenner,Albert J. Fornace

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.4c05688

IF: 4.1

2024-08-20

ACS Omega

Abstract:A realistic exposure to ionizing radiation (IR) from an improvised nuclear device will likely include individuals who are partially shielded from the initial blast delivered at a very high dose rate (VHDR). As different tissues have varying levels of radiosensitivity, e.g., hematopoietic vs gastrointestinal tissues, the effects of shielding on radiation biomarkers need to be addressed. Here, we explore how biofluid (urine and serum) metabolite signatures from male and female C57BL/6 mice exposed...

chemistry, multidisciplinary
New approaches to biological dosimetry: development of complex biodosimetric systems (review of foreign literature)

N. V. Sotnik,V. L. Rybkina,T. V. Azizova

DOI: https://doi.org/10.25016/2541-7487-2018-0-4-90-96

2019-02-10

Medicо Biological and Socio Psychological Problems of Safety in Emergency Situations

Abstract:Relevance. In case of emergency due to large-scale radiation accidents, biological dosimetry becomes a critical tool for early radiation dose assessment and enables identification of individuals exposed to ionizing radiation and facilitates further medical follow-up decisions. Intention. To assess the feasibility of a number of biological markers for bioindication and biodosimetry purposes based on literature data. Methodology. Literature sources were searched in MEDLINE databases, PubMed, CyberLeninka, elibrary.ru, using the terms: radiation, irradiation, biodosimetry. The review presents the results of studies from full-text sources of literature in English. Results and Discussion. Depending on an accidental exposure scenario, various biodosimetry techniques should be used to assess radiation doses with optimal accuracy and speed. In addition to physical methods and clinical techniques used to assess radiation doses, biological dosimetry defines a level of ionizing radiation exposure for certain individuals and is useful in making decisions about medical treatment strategy. To date, combined use of several biological markers within a biodosimetry system providing reliable radiation dose estimates. Conclusion. Analysis of the data presented in the review showed that combined use of several biological markers and development of a complex biodosimetric system will provide a more accurate estimate of doses, which is especially important in case of radiation accidents and incidents when physical dosimetry data are not available.
G0-PCC-FISH derived multi-parametric biodosimetry methodology for accidental high dose and partial body exposures

Usha Yadav,Nagesh N. Bhat,Utkarsha S. Mungse,Kapil B. Shirsath,Manish Joshi,Balvinder K. Sapra

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-65330-8

IF: 4.6

2024-07-13

Scientific Reports

Abstract:High dose radiation exposures are rare. However, medical management of such incidents is crucial due to mortality and tissue injury risks. Rapid radiation biodosimetry of high dose accidental exposures is highly challenging, considering that they usually involve non uniform fields leading to partial body exposures. The gold standard, dicentric assay and other conventional methods have limited application in such scenarios. As an alternative, we propose Premature Chromosome Condensation combined with Fluorescent In-situ Hybridization (G 0 -PCC-FISH) as a promising tool for partial body exposure biodosimetry. In the present study, partial body exposures were simulated ex-vivo by mixing of uniformly exposed blood with unexposed blood in varying proportions. After G 0 -PCC-FISH, Dolphin's approach with background correction was used to provide partial body exposure dose estimates and these were compared with those obtained from conventional dicentric assay and G 0 -PCC-Fragment assay (conventional G 0 -PCC). Dispersion analysis of aberrations from partial body exposures was carried out and compared with that of whole-body exposures. The latter was inferred from a multi-donor, wide dose range calibration curve, a-priori established for whole-body exposures. With the dispersion analysis, novel multi-parametric methodology for discerning the partial body exposure from whole body exposure and accurate dose estimation has been formulated and elucidated with the help of an example. Dose and proportion dependent reduction in sensitivity and dose estimation accuracy was observed for Dicentric assay, but not in the two PCC methods. G 0 -PCC-FISH was found to be most accurate for the dose estimation. G 0 -PCC-FISH has potential to overcome the shortcomings of current available methods and can provide rapid, accurate dose estimation of partial body and high dose accidental exposures. Biological dose estimation can be useful to predict progression of disease manifestation and can help in pre-planning of appropriate & timely medical intervention.

multidisciplinary sciences
Technologies for retrospective radiation dosimetry

Pradeep Narayan

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/rpd/ncad319

2024-07-17

Abstract:Radiation dosimetry is an important task for assessing the biological damages created in human being due to ionising radiation exposure. Ionising radiation being invisible and beyond the perception of human natural sensors, the dosimetry equipments/systems are the utmost requirement for its measurement. Retrospective measurement of radiation doses is a challenging task as conventional radiation dosemeters are not available at the exposure site. The material/s in close proximity of exposed individual or individuals' biological samples may be used as retrospective radiation sensor for dosimetry purpose. Environment materials such as sand, bricks, ceramics, sand stones, quartz, feldspar, glasses and electronic chips have been utilised using TL (Thermoluminescence) techniques for retrospective gamma dose (min 10 cGy) measurement. Electron Spin Resonance techniques have been employed to human biological samples such as tooth enamel, bones, nails, hair, etc. and reported for dosimetry for ~20 cGy min dose measurement. Some commercial glasses have been found sensitive enough to measure the minimum gamma doses of the order of 100 cGy using TL techniques. For internal retrospective dosimetry, the radioactivity contamination assessment in food items, water, other edible product and ambient air are the prerequisites. The radioactivity concentration vis-à-vis their consumption rate may help in controlling the internal contamination and estimation of dose absorption in human body. Defence Laboratory, Jodhpur has been working extensively on the dosimetry techniques for external dose measurement using environmental material and developed portable contamination monitoring systems for food and water radioactivity measurement in the range of 50 Bq kg-1 to 1000 kBq kg-1 in 60 s measurement time. The recent research and development in the methodologies, equipments and systems undertaken towards capacity building and self-reliance in retrospective radiation dosimetry is reported in this paper.
Scintillators for 3D and 4D dosimetry: current status and future potential for clinical translation

N Suchaworska,P Z Y Liu,A Ralston,P Naseri,P Abolfathi,J Lee,K Warrener,D R McKenzie

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/444/1/012075

2013-06-26

Journal of Physics: Conference Series

Abstract:New radiotherapy treatment techniques make unprecedented demands on dosimetry. Water equivalence, radiation hardness, high temporal and spatial resolution in 4D are no longer desirable but essential for safe implementation of several techniques. Plastic scintillation dosimetryhas the capabilities to meet all of the above criteria. Despite several attempts, a system has not yet been commercialised for widespread availability in the clinic. Successful translation of good science to the benefits of clinical practice demands that the primary focus be shifted from the technological innovation to the patient needs. We will present the clinically beneficial features of scintillation dosimetry and some remaining challenges. Then we will discuss the barriers to widespread availability of scintillation dosimeters.
The MCART radiation physics core: the quest for radiation dosimetry standardization.

Abdul M Kazi,Thomas J MacVittie,Giovanni Lasio,Wei Lu,Karl L Prado

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/HP.0b013e3182a2a987

2014-01-01

Health Physics

Abstract:Dose-related radiobiological research results can only be compared meaningfully when radiation dosimetry is standardized. To this purpose, the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID)-sponsored Medical Counter-measures Against Radiological Threats (MCART) consortium recently created a Radiation Physics Core (RPC) as an entity to assume responsibility of standardizing radiation dosimetry practices among its member laboratories. The animal research activities in these laboratories use a variety of ionizing photon beams from several irradiators such as 250-320 kVp x-ray generators, Cs-137 irradiators, Co-60 teletherapy machines, and medical linear accelerators (LINACs). In addition to this variety of sources, these centers use a range of irradiation techniques and make use of different dose calculation schemes to conduct their experiments. An extremely important objective in these research activities is to obtain a Dose Response Relationship (DRR) appropriate to their respective organ-specific models of acute and delayed radiation effects. A clear and unambiguous definition of the DRR is essential for the development of medical countermeasures. It is imperative that these DRRs are transparent between centers. The MCART RPC has initiated the establishment of standard dosimetry practices among member centers and is introducing a Remote Dosimetry Monitoring Service (RDMS) to ascertain ongoing quality assurance. This paper will describe the initial activities of the MCART RPC toward implementing these standardization goals. It is appropriate to report a summary of initial activities with the intent of reporting the full implementation at a later date.
Advancements and applications of dosimetry techniques in modern medical radiation therapy: a comprehensive review

Mohammed Dawood Salman,Yasmin Md Radzi,Azhar Abdul Rahman,Ammar A. Oglat,Mohammed Ali Dheyab

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10967-024-09517-3

2024-05-26

Journal of Radioanalytical and Nuclear Chemistry

Abstract:Recent advancements in medical dosimetry have significantly improved the precision and effectiveness of radiation therapy by accurately quantifying absorbed doses from ionizing radiation. In the past, conventional one-dimensional and two-dimensional dosimeters were commonly used, but recent years have seen a surge in interest in 3D dosimeters for complex radiation therapies. This review aims to elucidate the applications of 3D polymer gel dosimeters in radiation therapies, covering diverse radiation and energy fields. Utilizing an extensive search strategy across various electronic databases, the review synthesizes insights from recent studies on polymer gel dosimeters, exploring their properties and applications in ultrasound, optical coherence tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, and computed tomography. Furthermore, the review investigates the consideration of Monte Carlo simulations in modeling dosimeter applications in radiation therapy, examining specific parameters affecting dosimeter performance. It provides a comprehensive synthesis of available data over the past decade, shedding light on the medical applications of 3D polymer gel dosimeters and their potential limitations. Finally, the review discusses challenges in widespread implementation and future directions, emphasizing the need for further research on novel gel dosimeters and the incorporation of nanoparticles to enhance sensitivity and functionality in medical dosimetry.

chemistry, inorganic & nuclear, analytical,nuclear science & technology
Cancer and Radiation Therapy: Current Advances and Future Directions

Rajamanickam Baskar,Kuo Ann Lee,Richard Yeo,Kheng-Wei Yeoh

DOI: https://doi.org/10.7150/ijms.3635

2012-01-01

International Journal of Medical Sciences

Abstract:In recent years remarkable progress has been made towards the understanding of proposed hallmarks of cancer development and treatment. However with its increasing incidence, the clinical management of cancer continues to be a challenge for the 21st century. Treatment modalities comprise of radiation therapy, surgery, chemotherapy, immunotherapy and hormonal therapy. Radiation therapy remains an important component of cancer treatment with approximately 50% of all cancer patients receiving radiation therapy during their course of illness; it contributes towards 40% of curative treatment for cancer. The main goal of radiation therapy is to deprive cancer cells of their multiplication (cell division) potential. Celebrating a century of advances since Marie Curie won her second Nobel Prize for her research into radium, 2011 has been designated the Year of Radiation therapy in the UK. Over the last 100 years, ongoing advances in the techniques of radiation treatment and progress made in understanding the biology of cancer cell responses to radiation will endeavor to increase the survival and reduce treatment side effects for cancer patients. In this review, principles, application and advances in radiation therapy with their biological end points are discussed.

medicine, general & internal
Advances in Radiation Oncology: Current Status and Future Directions in India

Goura Kishor Rath,Ajeet Kumar Gandhi

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13193-022-01549-z

2022-05-11

Indian Journal of Surgical Oncology

Abstract:Radiation therapy is one of the core components of the comprehensive cancer care. Several new advancements in the radiation physics, radiation biology, and technical upgradation have led us in to a new era of radiation oncology. The access to quality radiation therapy treatment however remains a concern, and this mini-review emphasizes on these issues and also focuses on the future directions for radiation oncology in India.
Radiation Dose Units: How We Got Here, Do They Serve the Purposes They are Intended to?

Momina Mateen,Kaylyn Olshanoski,Nguyen Phuong Dang,Satoru Endo,Chary Rangacharyulu

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/15593258241282019

2024-07-01

Dose-Response

Abstract:The current radiation dose estimates used in medical imaging, radiation oncology or environmental assessments are not entirely accurate from a fundamental physics perspective, let alone for biological consequences. The “one cloth fits all” approach of radiation-matter interactions cannot assess the effects of interactions of the same species of radiation of different energies on the same isotope of an element. Preliminary steps to set the radiation dosimetry in the right direction are suggested.

pharmacology & pharmacy,radiology, nuclear medicine & medical imaging

Radiation biodosimetry: Current Status and Future Initiatives

HEMODOSE: A Set of Multi-parameter Biodosimetry Tools

Biodosimetry: Medicine, Science, and Systems to Support the Medical Decision-Maker Following a Large Scale Nuclear or Radiation Incident.

Multicentric evaluation of conventional dosimetry vs bio-dosimetry over a period of two years for a three-point contact

In Vivo Mammary Tumourigenesis in the Sprague-Dawley Rat and Microdosimetric Correlates

Internal Dosimetry: State of the Art and Research Needed

Rethinking Dosimetry: The Perils of Extrapolated External-Beam Radiotherapy Constraints to Radionuclide Therapy

Retrospective biodosimetry techniques: Focus on cytogenetics assays for individuals exposed to ionizing radiation

A Multiple Parameters Biodosimetry Tool with Various Blood Cell Counts - the Hemodose Approach

The NIAID/RNCP Biodosimetry Program: An Overview

Cytogenetic follow-up studies on humans with internal and external exposure to ionizing radiation

Impact of Partial Body Shielding from Very High Dose Rates on Untargeted Metabolomics in Biodosimetry

New approaches to biological dosimetry: development of complex biodosimetric systems (review of foreign literature)

G0-PCC-FISH derived multi-parametric biodosimetry methodology for accidental high dose and partial body exposures

Technologies for retrospective radiation dosimetry

Scintillators for 3D and 4D dosimetry: current status and future potential for clinical translation

The MCART radiation physics core: the quest for radiation dosimetry standardization.

Advancements and applications of dosimetry techniques in modern medical radiation therapy: a comprehensive review

Cancer and Radiation Therapy: Current Advances and Future Directions

Advances in Radiation Oncology: Current Status and Future Directions in India

Radiation Dose Units: How We Got Here, Do They Serve the Purposes They are Intended to?